Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Should a team have to be in their title game (not win, per se) to be considered for the CFP? Ohio St will not be in their title game but will get the #11 seed most likely.

They will be in IMO.  They beat 2 teams that will likely make it and 1 loss is to the #1 team.  
Can’t see Indiana in over them when the Buckeyes blew them out last week.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

They will be in IMO.  They beat 2 teams that will likely make it and 1 loss is to the #1 team.  
Can’t see Indiana in over them when the Buckeyes blew them out last week.

I'm just saying you should have to be in your title game in order to get to the CFP. And definitely not make it in over the loser of the title game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I'm just saying you should have to be in your title game in order to get to the CFP. And definitely not make it in over the loser of the title game.

I agree and I think they should be out but they will put them in there.  Some teams really want Texas to win tonight cuz that’ll be another convo if they don’t make the SEC champ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND….there the refs go.  They were short there.  All the announcers agreed and then suddenly….refs say it’s good after review.  More work to be done though. 

standard much much higher to overturn a call in this game than Clemson’s lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good news is that we are pretty uniquely well established to address all of our needs this season. We have $14m real cap space, and something like $40m in trade deadline cap space. Not sure exactly how that works out. But, we have the room to absorb any bad contracts. With recent rule changes regarding retention, that went into effect this season, we now have a huge advantage in the trade market.  On top of that, while we do have obvious needs, we also have a glut of talent in certain areas that we struggle to find ice time for. We are over-stocked on scrappy talented lil-guys, strong defensively sound 3rd liners and shutdown left shot dmen. Whether it's a package or separate deals, idk. But, one of each from Stank/Blake/Nads, Erob/Carrier/KK/Jank, and Walker/Nystrom; throw in some 1st round picks (and frankly any other prospects they want) and we should be able to come out with a 1b to pair with Bussi and either a 2c with size or a 2c and size.   TL/DR We got the money, you got the stuff?
    • I don’t  think 6’4 was ever considered small or undersized. Baby hands tho, yes that was his thing That’s an interesting idea, like an optical illusion? Sounds like you have personal experience with this! 
    • in the 25' draft the Carolina Panthers had hired Brandt Tillis someone who actually understood how to build a successful team & build through the draft .  this team was yes mismanaged for years prior to Brandt Tillis joining the team in 25' & rarely done anything right in the draft outside occaionaly getting lucky on an UDFA such as Jalen Coker who's dad coincidentally happened to be a huge Carolina Panthers fan, hint hint  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...