Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Should a team have to be in their title game (not win, per se) to be considered for the CFP? Ohio St will not be in their title game but will get the #11 seed most likely.

They will be in IMO.  They beat 2 teams that will likely make it and 1 loss is to the #1 team.  
Can’t see Indiana in over them when the Buckeyes blew them out last week.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

They will be in IMO.  They beat 2 teams that will likely make it and 1 loss is to the #1 team.  
Can’t see Indiana in over them when the Buckeyes blew them out last week.

I'm just saying you should have to be in your title game in order to get to the CFP. And definitely not make it in over the loser of the title game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I'm just saying you should have to be in your title game in order to get to the CFP. And definitely not make it in over the loser of the title game.

I agree and I think they should be out but they will put them in there.  Some teams really want Texas to win tonight cuz that’ll be another convo if they don’t make the SEC champ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND….there the refs go.  They were short there.  All the announcers agreed and then suddenly….refs say it’s good after review.  More work to be done though. 

standard much much higher to overturn a call in this game than Clemson’s lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...