Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Should a team have to be in their title game (not win, per se) to be considered for the CFP? Ohio St will not be in their title game but will get the #11 seed most likely.

They will be in IMO.  They beat 2 teams that will likely make it and 1 loss is to the #1 team.  
Can’t see Indiana in over them when the Buckeyes blew them out last week.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

They will be in IMO.  They beat 2 teams that will likely make it and 1 loss is to the #1 team.  
Can’t see Indiana in over them when the Buckeyes blew them out last week.

I'm just saying you should have to be in your title game in order to get to the CFP. And definitely not make it in over the loser of the title game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I'm just saying you should have to be in your title game in order to get to the CFP. And definitely not make it in over the loser of the title game.

I agree and I think they should be out but they will put them in there.  Some teams really want Texas to win tonight cuz that’ll be another convo if they don’t make the SEC champ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND….there the refs go.  They were short there.  All the announcers agreed and then suddenly….refs say it’s good after review.  More work to be done though. 

standard much much higher to overturn a call in this game than Clemson’s lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...