Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

If he hands it off the guy walks in.

Ridiculous coaching by GT in OT with the 2 pt plays. They had 8 2 pt attempts including the PI and they passed with no run fake on 7 of them. The other was a QB run. They handed off to RBs 0 times out of 8. UGA finally hands it off and wins.

If GT tried to run more and hands it to a RB, they score more than 1 in 8 and win.

There has been a lot of stupid coaching today and yesterday at the end of games. Do what you do well and don’t screw up clock management and you might actually win. Do what we saw and you lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Ridiculous coaching by GT in OT with the 2 pt plays. They had 8 2 pt attempts including the PI and they passed with no run fake on 7 of them. The other was a QB run. They handed off to RBs 0 times out of 8. UGA finally hands it off and wins.

If GT tried to run more and hands it to a RB, they score more than 1 in 8 and win.

There has been a lot of stupid coaching today and yesterday at the end of games. Do what you do well and don’t screw up clock management and you might actually win. Do what we saw and you lose.

The two point conversion plays were idiotic. They'd been killing them all night running the ball and running run/pass options then they basically played the OTs like they were a pure passing offense. Not putting King on the move with a run/pass option not even once in OT is gonna haunt them.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seriously?  When Dalton started against the Raiders and put up 300 yards and 3 TDs, this board was collectively BUZZING with excitement.  Even a lot of people who get accused of being Bryce "stans" (i.e. people who were simply willing to be a bit more patient with him) were ecstatic at seeing a functional offense for once and were ready to close the book on Bryce.  Who the hell was making excuses and saying it was against a bad defense?  The problem with you guys is you'll take a single standalone comment made by the biggest most radical Bryce fan in the galaxy and then generalize it as "Bryce stans said _________" to be sensational rather than engage with the vast majority of people giving more rational and levelheaded pushback.  I don't even think there are more than one or two people who have a positive emotional attachment to Bryce as an individual...most of the people you call "stans", are people who just generally adopt a more optimistic mindset and therefore are more defensive of our players and staff and will often give them the benefit of the doubt and root for their success (because that's in the team's best interest).  I mean I'm one of those people...and I guarantee you the minute Bryce gets cut (hypothetically), I will have zero care for his career at that point. It's also ironic that you so freely call people Bryce stans but you pearl-clutch at the notion that he has haters.  It's two sides of the same coin, dawg.  If we're to use your standards, then the bar for being considered a "stan" is subterranean, and the bar for being considered a "hater" is apparently somewhere approaching deep space.  If we were to put your post history up against the Final Boss of all Bryce stans (hell, the 10 biggest Bryce stans in Huddle history), your negative posts would outnumber their positive posts like easily 20:1.  So yeah I have no clue what the criteria is at this point.  Speaking of your post history...anyone can feel free to pop in there to see all the wonderful genuine praise you've been giving Bryce.  I mean they don't even need to look at your post history...you showed an example of what your praise looks like in your post I'm quoting now.  Let's paraphrase: he technically improved.....because he was just that awful early in the year, it's basically impossible not to improve.  And yeah maybe he threw some dimes....IT'S ABOUT TIME!  TOOK LONG ENOUGH!!  You see how even your praise needs to be couched in jabs?  It's like a compliment sandwich that gets jammed in between two slices of insults.
    • My man really just dropped the bag. Couldn't cut the crap for 6 months so you could secure generational wealth for you and your family. What a shame. 
    • This should be in the NFL rule book. 
×
×
  • Create New...