Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

No they quite literally were passed over for 2 slap dicks from the ACC. Warde Manuel said himself " data points" 

That fat fug.is still mad Clowney killed his running back in the bowl game. 

Yeah, again,  they literally weren’t passed over for 2 ACC teams.   Clemson were the ACC champs.   That’s like saying they the CFP committee opted to put in Boise State and ASU in over SC.  

They picked SMU over you.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Yeah, again,  they literally weren’t passed over for 2 ACC teams.   Clemson were the ACC champs.   That’s like saying they the CFP committee opted to put in Boise State and ASU in over SC.  

They picked SMU over you.   

Atlantic Coastal Cookies

 

You can't have more than 1 cookie out of the conference. Clemson deserved to be there as the champs. SMU had no business being in the picture. Alabama was screwed over for a cookie.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

and I'm saying with my whole chest they would walk in and roll over half the teams in the playoffs. Since realistically speaking Clemson is 0-3 vs the SEC and they still put them in. 

SC finds a way to BARELY sneak past Clemson, who doesn’t play defense anymore….now suddenly you think SC is King Kong? 

SC wasn’t going to go into Texas and do anything different.  Score less points.  Allow less points.  Result would have been the same most likely.  So realistically, SC would have had 4 SEC losses on the year, 

could they of put an SEC in over SMU? Maybe.  But it’s probably not yall.  It’s Bama.  

And SC clearly doesn’t have the O to be a legit threat in  a college football playoff this year.  There is no great tragedy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Atlantic Coastal Cookies

 

You can't have more than 1 cookie out of the conference. Clemson deserved to be there as the champs. SMU had no business being in the picture. Alabama was screwed over for a cookie.

Alabama has two bad losses on their record. The only entity that screwed over Alabama was Alabama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

I agree Tenn and Texas both got easy schedules 

 

with these super conferences they need a way to force a play in towards the end. 

The 12 team format is a play in. Arguing that one team would be #12 over another is just semantics as both would get stomped. It is about finding the best team, not which of four is most deserving of being #12

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CRA said:

SC finds a way to BARELY sneak past Clemson, who doesn’t play defense anymore….now suddenly you think SC is King Kong? 

SC wasn’t going to go into Texas and do anything different.  Score less points.  Allow less points.  Result would have been the same most likely.  So realistically, SC would have had 4 SEC losses on the year, 

could they of put an SEC in over SMU? Maybe.  But it’s probably not yall.  It’s Bama.  

And SC clearly doesn’t have the O to be a legit threat in  a college football playoff this year.  There is no great tragedy. 

Maybe go back and watch the Clem game again. Costly turnovers in the redzone by both teams. Easily could have been a 34-24 type of deal if both teams dont do that stuff. 

I never said they were king kong. Only that they are flat out one of the top 12 best and thats a fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Yeah, again,  they literally weren’t passed over for 2 ACC teams.   Clemson were the ACC champs.   That’s like saying they the CFP committee opted to put in Boise State and ASU in over SC.  

They picked SMU over you.   

SC won the ACC title the week before in Clemsons own house. Committee was worried about optics over talent. 

I've been pounding the drum that Beamer is a weenie since the Clemson game because he refused to lobby as a 10 win team and call refs out and eat a fine. 

Then proceeded to say he was friends with Dabo before being thrown under the bus right after the ACC title game when his "friend" said "herr derr SMU better be in the playoffs herr derr" 

Beamer always takes the high road and thats why his team is sitting at home. 

Edited by SCMunnerlyn1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOLOLOLOL

Laugh if you want. Entire chest. Nobody wants a piece right now.
Got to watch our red headed step child and their door mat get beat like a rented mule and we have to watch the opt out bowl vs Illinois which by the way we were hand picked for meaning they thought we were better than both Ole Miss and Bama. So at least one committee knows ball. 

The best 12 teams didnt make the playoff and Greg Sankey got played like a fiddle by that committee and he could have avoided all of that simply by not trying to influence the outcome of games in his own conference. 

Should be fired high key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Laugh if you want. Entire chest. Nobody wants a piece right now.
Got to watch our red headed step child and their door mat get beat like a rented mule and we have to watch the opt out bowl vs Illinois which by the way we were hand picked for meaning they thought we were better than both Ole Miss and Bama. So at least one committee knows ball. 

The best 12 teams didnt make the playoff and Greg Sankey got played like a fiddle by that committee and he could have avoided all of that simply by not trying to influence the outcome of games in his own conference. 

Should be fired high key.

Enjoy your also ran bowl with the rest of us undeserving peasants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I fully expect them to pick up his 5th year , and they're waiting for him to put a full excellent consistent season of QB play in year 4 or 5. If that don't happen,  they'll eventually cut ties.  Here's to hoping he just goes on a team in 2026. The worst thing he could do is continue to see-saw us to around .500 records because it might be impossible to replace him at that point unless youre willing to do the veteran qb carousel poo we did from 2019 to 2023.   
    • What do you think of Bryce Youngs career thus far? Are you excited about his progress or is it not enough for you? I included a poll of ranking his performance through 3 years thus far.  I personally think he's made some decent progress. Has had some high moments (last half of 2024, Rams game, ATL game in 2025)  but in my mind, those are still outweighed by the many more lowlights thus far (ex turnovers, missed throws, poor decisions)  It's a very mixed bag for me. He's done enough to get a 5th year option but by no means should we lock him in with a 50+ mil a year multi year deal. I want to see him play consistently well for a full year before that happens (yes, I'm still saying that going into year 4. That might be telling).  Just sucks when you see CJ Stroud, Jayden Daniel's, Caleb Williams almost immediately lighting poo up with their arm talent. Maybe Bryce is just an ultra slow burn. I don't know what to think anymore. Guess we're gonna be stuck with him for a whilr unless we end up being bad enough to earn a high pick next year. I doubted it lol. Overall Stats for his career:       ● 14 W - 30L (regular season)       ● 0-1 playoffs record        ● 61.4% completion, 8291 passing yards, 49 TDs, 30 INTs  Year 1:       ● 2 wins, 14 losses      ● 60% completion rate, 2877 passing yards, 11 TD to 10 INTs, 5.5 yards per attempted pass Year 2:        ● 4 wins , 8 losses        ● 60.9% completion rate,  2403 passing yards, 15 TD, 9 INTs,  6.3 yards per attempted pass  Year 3:        ● 8 Wins, 8 Losses         ● 63.6% competition rate, 3011 passing yards, 23 TDs to 11 INTs  Playoffs         ● 1 game in year 3 ( 0 - 1 in playoffs)         ● 21/40 (52.5% completion rate), 264 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT. 
    • Raiders receive: 19th overall Xavier Legette Panthers receive: Maxx Crosby 3rd rounder
×
×
  • Create New...