Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young benched

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, CRA said:

sure, it's just a great setup in a vacuum.

but as he entered his 17th game of his career....it was still has 3rd HC, 3rd playcaller, 3rd O, who could count what # of OL setup it was....and his HC didn't give him any real time to work on things in the preseason under live fire.  It wasn't a great setup in reality for Bryce because all those things before the week 1 game factor. 

We shouldn't of drafted Young.  But we did ensure we got the worst version of whatever he was going to be.  And that's a worry going forward, about the brainiacs in charge.  Their entire plan going into the Canales era was an utter joke.....and it was still utter joke even if they felt they would move on from his quickly.  Because they didn't setup and prep for that being a legit possibility. 

It appears as if they didn't think there was any way he could fail after what they did for him in the offseason. They chose poorly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It appears as if they didn't think there was any way he could fail after what they did for him in the offseason. They chose poorly. 

it was always obvious Bryce Young was going to greatly struggling in the type O Canales was going to want to run.  The looks and throws run against what Bryce Young is.  Talked about ever since the pairing was made.   I know I talked about it non-stop.  Bad marriages. 

So that's why benching Bryce does nothing really to change the trajectory.  We don't have good people in charge.  Will be maybe get better QB from Dalton in Canales O? Sure.   But we are further behind than ever before at the QB spot....than we have in the Tepper era. 

I keep saying it over and over.  The Tepper Era really is defined by a desperate idiot at BOA that botches the QB thing over and over and over.  And it is without question, he brings out the worst possible outcome for any QB.  Andy Dalton is likely not about to have a good time.  Maybe a good debut as new and different helps most people initially.  So I am prepared for a insane overreaction to Sunday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It appears as if they didn't think there was any way he could fail after what they did for him in the offseason. They chose poorly. 

It also appears it wouldn't have made any difference. It wasn't a good strategy but is the outcome going to change in the end? I don't think so.

Rookie HC who is woefully inexperienced makes a bonehead mistake. But that was also the same staff they could get to even come here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It also appears it wouldn't have made any difference. It wasn't a good strategy but is the outcome going to change in the end? I don't think so.

Rookie HC who is woefully inexperienced makes a bonehead mistake. But that was also the same staff they could get to even come here.

yeah, lot of folks sort getting cover here.....because Bryce is bad.  Collectively the fanbase right now is willing to overlook the obvious bad going into this season. 

We are worse now than the Frank Reich era (despite much better foundational talent on O).....because of this present day staff.  So much for the legendary advisor Jim Caldwell lol.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CRA said:

it was always obvious Bryce Young was going to greatly struggling in the type O Canales was going to want to run.  The looks and throws run against what Bryce Young is.  Talked about ever since the pairing was made.   I know I talked about it non-stop.  Bad marriages. 

So that's why benching Bryce does nothing really to change the trajectory.  We don't have good people in charge.  Will be maybe get better QB from Dalton in Canales O? Sure.   But we are further behind than ever before at the QB spot....than we have in the Tepper era. 

I keep saying it over and over.  The Tepper Era really is defined by a desperate idiot at BOA that botches the QB thing over and over and over.  And it is without question, he brings out the worst possible outcome for any QB.  Andy Dalton is likely not about to have a good time.  Maybe a good debut as new and different helps most people initially.  So I am prepared for a insane overreaction to Sunday.

 

It was obvious Young was always going to struggle regardless. You have been absolutely right about the bad marriages but I think your wrong about Dalton. I'm way more concerned about his health than his fit in DC's offensive scheme. I also want to see what his in game coaching looks like with a QB that can make the most basic throws. I'm not very confident or impressed so far but it needs to be seen without the Young excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, lot of folks sort getting cover here.....because Bryce is bad.  Collectively the fanbase right now is willing to overlook the obvious bad going into this season. 

We are worse now than the Frank Reich era (despite much better foundational talent on O).....because of this present day staff.  So much for the legendary advisor Jim Caldwell lol.  

Caldwell...ugh. It's hard to say we are better or worse. The set up of the Reich year was so bad even if his experience is really missed this year. This one is not looking good either. IDK yet. I wouldn't be praising either at this point. DC has done 1 thing I see as a greenflag and I don't even know if it was really his call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, CRA said:

it was always obvious Bryce Young was going to greatly struggling in the type O Canales was going to want to run.  The looks and throws run against what Bryce Young is.  Talked about ever since the pairing was made.   I know I talked about it non-stop.  Bad marriages. 

So that's why benching Bryce does nothing really to change the trajectory.  We don't have good people in charge.  Will be maybe get better QB from Dalton in Canales O? Sure.   But we are further behind than ever before at the QB spot....than we have in the Tepper era. 

I keep saying it over and over.  The Tepper Era really is defined by a desperate idiot at BOA that botches the QB thing over and over and over.  And it is without question, he brings out the worst possible outcome for any QB.  Andy Dalton is likely not about to have a good time.  Maybe a good debut as new and different helps most people initially.  So I am prepared for a insane overreaction to Sunday.

 

As long as Tepper is the one making the key decisions expect things to stay as they are, a clusterf**k. He makes the wrong choice every single time. He has to empower someone to make those decisions for him and the team.  Dan needs to answer to a President of football and not David. Canales should only report to Dan and only talk to Tepper if the cross paths in the hallway.  These Monday morning meetings MUST stop. In other words, call KEVEN COLBERT an suck him off if he has to to get him involved. 

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Waldo said:

Caldwell...ugh. It's hard to say we are better or worse. The set up of the Reich year was so bad even if his experience is really missed this year. This one is not looking good either. IDK yet. I wouldn't be praising either at this point. DC has done 1 thing I see as a greenflag and I don't even know if it was really his call.

it's the worst start in franchise history.  Frank was actually in games.  Canales hasn't been in a game going into the half.  Heck, Canales hasn't been in a game going into the 2nd quarter. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, CRA said:

it was always obvious Bryce Young was going to greatly struggling in the type O Canales was going to want to run.  The looks and throws run against what Bryce Young is.  Talked about ever since the pairing was made.   I know I talked about it non-stop.  Bad marriages. 

So that's why benching Bryce does nothing really to change the trajectory.  We don't have good people in charge.  Will be maybe get better QB from Dalton in Canales O? Sure.   But we are further behind than ever before at the QB spot....than we have in the Tepper era. 

I keep saying it over and over.  The Tepper Era really is defined by a desperate idiot at BOA that botches the QB thing over and over and over.  And it is without question, he brings out the worst possible outcome for any QB.  Andy Dalton is likely not about to have a good time.  Maybe a good debut as new and different helps most people initially.  So I am prepared for a insane overreaction to Sunday.

 

What? it was literally the exact opposite thought beforehand lol

Most thought his type of offense played into young's strengths at the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, scpanther22 said:

What? it was literally the exact opposite thought beforehand lol

Most thought his type of offense played into young's strengths at the time

In no sane world....does a downfield chunk pass offense play to Bryce Young's strengths.  All of his offenses he has been around, from Tampa to Seattle have lead the league in deep shot attempts (often #1 in the league).  That was broken down time and time again.  It's the whole bad marriages thing.  

How would that play to Bryce Young's strengths? 

Now did some fans choose to run with the entering the season BS Panther propaganda and run with it? Sure.  The catering to Bryce bolonga?  Canales' O have always been consistent.  And Bryce is as bad of a fit for THAT as it gets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

it's the worst start in franchise history.  Frank was actually in games.  Canales hasn't been in a game going into the half.  Heck, Canales hasn't been in a game going into the 2nd quarter. 

Last years crew was a nightmare and it tore itself apart. This one isn't impressive but it's also not that. They also earned the #1 pick they pissed away in a terrible trade last year regardless of wins for a QB that can't play at this level. It's really not a hill worth fighting over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, CRA said:

In no sane world....does a downfield chunk pass offense play to Bryce Young's strengths.  All of his offenses he has been around, from Tampa to Seattle have lead the league in deep shot attempts (often #1 in the league).  That was broken down time and time again.  It's the whole bad marriages thing.  

How would that play to Bryce Young's strengths? 

Now did some fans choose to run with the entering the season BS Panther propaganda and run with it? Sure.  The catering to Bryce bolonga?  Canales' O have always been consistent.  And Bryce is as bad of a fit for THAT as it gets. 

It might hint that they had decided on Bryce early on and are not trying to tailor the offense to him.

Alternately, it was stated that Bryce was getting input about what his best plays from Alabama were, the rollouts, that sort of thing.

None of it can be revealed if the QB checks down nearly every passing play.

 It might be Bama it might be Dan Henning play action + deep shot, how could people tell from what the fug it was supposed to be from he was doing? 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted

I forgot to say, that sorry ass passing chart is a pretty strong indication of what Canales is working with.

I don't have all 22 to see all the routes and if there were people running downfield towards that other end zone. 

One fuging jump ball to Legette was all I asked. 

Not really, but it was the main attraction on Sunday, but no we got Pop Warner boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...