Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Red Rocket Era Begins


PanthersGTI
 Share

Recommended Posts

You let Canales & Morgan bring in their QBs to develop as back ups behind Dalton starting now. Let's see if Young keeps the #2 spot with serious competition.

Cooper Rush would be an easy trade if Tepper's willing to let go of Young. RIdder is on a practice squad. Go with vet QBs to build a team until Arch Manning? Maybe Canales polishes up another 30 year old QB like Geno Smith or Baker Mayfield? Dalton and Rush were together in Dallas.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yo maybe the former Bryce optimists can get on the Dalton wagon!?! Where did all the "root for my team no matter what!" guys go? At least Dalton seems excited to play and is feeling confident?

 

That kind of aligns with my general thoughts. It is hopeful. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, strato said:

That kind of aligns with my general thoughts. It is hopeful. 

At least if it doesn't look like football it won't be a huge question mark as to why. I imagine Dalton watched the all 22 from Sunday and was like I got this. Then teams will adjust and we'll have to see if Canales can adjust etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm exciting for dalton. The offense will look competent.

Even in the Seattle game last year the playcalling was bad, he just improvised threw it. We will see what happens with better playcalling, o line, and receivers this time around.

 

 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I'm exciting for dalton. The offense will look competent.

Even in the Seattle game last year the playcalling was bad, he just improvised threw it. We will see what happens with better playcalling, o line, and receivers this time around.

 

 

I forgot Dalton and Thielen already had that game last year where Thielen had 145 yards and a td. Should be no problem for them to get something worked out with Diontae Johnson in a few practices. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...