Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Question/Quick Vent


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, travisura said:

We wear white too much imo, but it's mainly because they have an obsession with not wearing black early in the season. 

The worst uniform development recently was changing the metallic silver pants to a matte gray finish. Looks terrible and doesn't match the helmets.

Well it’s still hot as hell playing football in September, so that tracks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Best thing about them was the Thanksgiving game.  I never liked the blue uniform though.  Even just the jersey when it was introduced around 2003-2004 ish?

Yeah. Somewhere floating around is a sweet pick of Luke running the INT back and you see Cam trailing him down the sideline with that big ole smile.  To me, that’s the blues.  Luke/Cam era.  Think that’s what I like them.  

think Luke was wearing them in that scary game he went down in too.  I obviously don’t like them because of that but when I think back about those big time players those blues were woven into the memory bank. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah. Somewhere floating around is a sweet pick of Luke running the INT back and you see Cam trailing him down the sideline with that big ole smile.  To me, that’s the blues.  Luke/Cam era.  Think that’s what I like them.  

think Luke was wearing them in that scary game he went down in too.  I obviously don’t like them because of that but when I think back about those big time players those blues were woven into the memory bank. 

I will say that the Blue color rush is better than the blue with grey pants like they wore when they debuted.  Hideous.

My favorite blue jersey combo is white pants, which I assume is not popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...