Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daniel Jones benched


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Well unfortunately nothing to us. But he has been giving to the rest of the league. He's been so bad he was getting opposing defenders all kinds of accolades and salary increases. Now though he's taking back. You can't lose to a Bryce Young led offense and not expect swift ramifications ya know?

9atajk.jpg.352a9ff86e8968481a0ff80fd16478ef.jpg

Sorry I was not thinking in  terms of others just us. Good point.

18 minutes ago, 7CLOWNS said:

Who's going lose their job after the Chief's game????

Hopefully the little engine that can't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I will never understand how that organization gave him $40M/year after a "breakout" season that saw him throw a grand total of 15 TD passes.

I'm not even sure Tepper would sign off on something that stupid.

Partly owner interference, partly the “well we have to pay him or try to find someone else”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ghostofdelhomme said:

Similar to Jalen Hurts who would be just as bad on the Giants and he makes even more $. Imagine what a real QB would do with that OL and weapons on the Eagles

Hurts arguably outplayed Mahomes in the SB just a few years ago.

 

If you don't know football just say you don't bro. This was a bad take learn from it come back better next week k.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...