Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roster Moves; QB Plummer signed to active roster

ProcessBlue2

By ProcessBlue2,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ProcessBlue2 Mentor

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted (edited)

Per Joe Person

  • Hubbard; Smith-Wade added to IR
  • Mike Boone signed to active roster
  • Jack Plummer signed to active roster
  • Deshawn Williams elevated to active roster

Not sure why Plummer is getting signed unless they are taking a look at him. Bryce was on injury report this week but was FP on Friday.

Edited by ProcessBlue2
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Per Joe Person

  • Hubbard; Smith-Wade added to IR
  • Mike Boone signed to active roster
  • Jack Plummer signed to active roster
  • Deshawn Williams elevated to active roster

Not sure why Plummer is getting signed unless they are taking a look at him. Bryce was on injury report this week but was FP on Friday.

Plummer going to be the #2?  I imagine he will get some time if the game slips away--one side or the other.   Might mean Dalton has taken his last snap in a Panther uniform.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Mentor

ProcessBlue2

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

Plummer going to be the #2?  I imagine he will get some time if the game slips away--one side or the other. 

Way I see it Plummer has to be the #2 otherwise he would just be elevated not signed.

They could shut Bryce down, although I doubt it. Canales always preaches how important reps are but then again you risk him getting hurt or having a bad confidence game. Who knows maybe his hamstring "flares up" and they use that to shut him down. 

Interesting either way.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Way I see it Plummer has to be the #2 otherwise he would just be elevated not signed.

They could shut Bryce down, although I doubt it. Canales always preaches how important reps are but then again you risk him getting hurt or having a bad confidence game. Who knows maybe his hamstring "flares up" and they use that to shut him down. 

Interesting either way.

I think they are already thinking about the QB position and Plummer's last preseason game was strong, following a terrible one.  I imagine he plays, unless the game is on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I've seen worse.

image.thumb.png.5f614a10c5e7825a10c89f128b6b9079.png

Wouldn't hang my hat on that performance. That game featured "the drive" by Bryce Young that had us riding a high into the regular season that quickly turned into a nightmare.

If Plummer gets playing time it's likely to get ugly.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I think Dalton is going to retire. He lost a lot of zip on the ball from Vegas to Washington. He looked exhausted after those 5 games.

I didn't see that at all. I am not saying this to disaparage Bryce but Dalton has more zip on most of his passes than Bryce. But he also generally has a stronger arm.

Honestly the Plummer move definitely smells like prepping to tank.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Mentor

ProcessBlue2

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I didn't see that at all. I am not saying this to disaparage Bryce but Dalton has more zip on most of his passes than Bryce. But he also generally has a stronger arm.

Honestly the Plummer move definitely smells like prepping to tank.

Even after the 5 games he still had more zip than Bryce. Maybe it was just me but I didn't see the game arm strength he had after the Vegas and Cinci games.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Even after the 5 games he still had more zip than Bryce. Maybe it was just me but I didn't see the game arm strength he had after the Vegas and Cinci games.

I think that was more to do with the results than the play. Go back and watch those games. He really didn't show any sign of physical decline, IMO.

Not saying it isn't possibly coming but I don't think that is something I would be that worried about. I would like to see him stick around, actually. I think he is good for Bryce and is definitely one of the most capable #2 QB's in the NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...