Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early NFL offseason chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Screenshot_20250120_154304.thumb.jpg.d14eb43d531058bb754a0c678a260620.jpg

 

@Mr. Scot I told you. This was the only job that really made sense.

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

Was Marty Hurney there shoveling home cooked meatballs down his gullet?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Only two options that make the bears job look good.  He still would have been better off taking the Washington job last year.

There was something about an issue between him and Adam Peters that nixed that job. I forget the specifics but it might actually be earlier in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

But it is the best situation.

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

If he is making 15 million per year it's a no brainer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. Those are all advantages over Vegas. Literally the only "media" advantage was Brady as part owner but being a great player may have nothing to do with that. See Jordan, Michael.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?

From what I've read, Brady was a big part of it. Other selling points were that they were prepared to give him who he wanted as a GM (Jags might have been willing to do that but it wasn't certain) plus he could have started with his own guy rather than a QB picked by someone else and of course word was the Raiders were prepared to offer an insane amount of cash. 

I can't blame him for not wanting to work with Mark Davis, of course. Though to be fair, have the Bears of the last few years been n much better?

There's an article on ESPN about the McCaskeys that says they've been pretty heavily influenced by former Bear and current agent Trace Armstrong in several of their past decisions. I haven't had time to read it yet, but it does sound interesting.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. 

Potential franchise QB is also potential massive bust.

I'd add some Bear fans might argue you the "idiot owner" part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, frankw said:

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

Even through different GMs and coaches, Chicago's history at the quarterback position would have to be upgraded massively to qualify as being called "woeful".

I know they have high hopes for Williams, but I'm not sold on him being the answer yet.

(they had high hopes for Fields too, and they could have had Daniels)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...