Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early NFL offseason chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Screenshot_20250120_154304.thumb.jpg.d14eb43d531058bb754a0c678a260620.jpg

 

@Mr. Scot I told you. This was the only job that really made sense.

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

Was Marty Hurney there shoveling home cooked meatballs down his gullet?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Only two options that make the bears job look good.  He still would have been better off taking the Washington job last year.

There was something about an issue between him and Adam Peters that nixed that job. I forget the specifics but it might actually be earlier in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Was Marty Hurney there shoveling home cooked meatballs down his gullet?

Hurney's still in Washington along with Scott Fitterer, oddly enough.

Neither has the executive level power they used to have, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

But it is the best situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

But it is the best situation.

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

If he is making 15 million per year it's a no brainer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. Those are all advantages over Vegas. Literally the only "media" advantage was Brady as part owner but being a great player may have nothing to do with that. See Jordan, Michael.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?

From what I've read, Brady was a big part of it. Other selling points were that they were prepared to give him who he wanted as a GM (Jags might have been willing to do that but it wasn't certain) plus he could have started with his own guy rather than a QB picked by someone else and of course word was the Raiders were prepared to offer an insane amount of cash. 

I can't blame him for not wanting to work with Mark Davis, of course. Though to be fair, have the Bears of the last few years been n much better?

There's an article on ESPN about the McCaskeys that says they've been pretty heavily influenced by former Bear and current agent Trace Armstrong in several of their past decisions. I haven't had time to read it yet, but it does sound interesting.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. 

Potential franchise QB is also potential massive bust.

I'd add some Bear fans might argue you the "idiot owner" part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, frankw said:

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

Even through different GMs and coaches, Chicago's history at the quarterback position would have to be upgraded massively to qualify as being called "woeful".

I know they have high hopes for Williams, but I'm not sold on him being the answer yet.

(they had high hopes for Fields too, and they could have had Daniels)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Screenshot_20250120_154304.thumb.jpg.d14eb43d531058bb754a0c678a260620.jpg

 

@Mr. Scot I told you. This was the only job that really made sense.

 

This has got to be a massive kick in the you-know-what for Lions fans. I doubt he'll get a welcome reception when he's back inside their stadium next season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh I went off and fully entertained my wife last night as my emails go to her phone as well because of my health. So she got the whole conversation as it happened.    Like I went to games in Detroit for the cup finals, I've been to games in Greensboro, Raleigh, and Chicago as well. My mom and her nurse friend double dated one of the players from when the team was in Greensboro. "He's still with the team in some compacity as well." I know people who work for the team at the arena as well. How the hell would I not be considered a fan. Only reason I haven't gone to a game since 2022 is because of my health and money situation. Last game I went to was at United Center in Chicago and me and my wife spent around 1k for glass seats and some food at the arena and we were next to the penalty box. The pictures of the hurricane players I took are lost because my phone crapped out a few weeks later. 
    • The Falcons win was a fantastic way to end the season and I think just about every Panthers fan would agree the team the coaching staff and particularly Bryce Young were impressive. We really needed that. Credit where it's due. At the same time. Now we have to establish it wasn't just a flash in the pan. We had one of those earlier in the season against the Raiders. As a tortured Panthers fan I have to acknowledge that. I know you're joking but in all seriousness I don't think the QB sneak is something for us to be concerned about in general but I would be lying to myself if I did not acknowledge that looking back at one particular game last season where we continually trotted out Eddie Pinero on 4th and short on the opponents side of the field we could use some creativity in those situations and it's also a matter of predictability. As time goes on it's something for Canales to work on and figure out. Especially with our kicker situation as it stands.
    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
×
×
  • Create New...