Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early NFL offseason chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Screenshot_20250120_154304.thumb.jpg.d14eb43d531058bb754a0c678a260620.jpg

 

@Mr. Scot I told you. This was the only job that really made sense.

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

Was Marty Hurney there shoveling home cooked meatballs down his gullet?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Only two options that make the bears job look good.  He still would have been better off taking the Washington job last year.

There was something about an issue between him and Adam Peters that nixed that job. I forget the specifics but it might actually be earlier in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Was Marty Hurney there shoveling home cooked meatballs down his gullet?

Hurney's still in Washington along with Scott Fitterer, oddly enough.

Neither has the executive level power they used to have, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do think the Jags made sense if he didn't want to do in direct competition with Campbell. The Raiders also if he wanted to basically pick his own GM and run the whole show.

Chicago was always an option though. How good of one depends on your opinion of Williams.

Not terribly surprised by him choosing Chicago. Kinda surprised by them making the hire without even doing a second interview.

Guess they just wanted him that bad.

The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

But it is the best situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

But it is the best situation.

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

If he is making 15 million per year it's a no brainer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Compared to the Raiders it's certainly debatable but I'd give the edge to Chicago. Still. Between the two jobs it's basically comparing turds.

I'll be eager to see how seamlessly he transitions into being the guy as opposed to one of the moving parts.

It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. Those are all advantages over Vegas. Literally the only "media" advantage was Brady as part owner but being a great player may have nothing to do with that. See Jordan, Michael.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?

From what I've read, Brady was a big part of it. Other selling points were that they were prepared to give him who he wanted as a GM (Jags might have been willing to do that but it wasn't certain) plus he could have started with his own guy rather than a QB picked by someone else and of course word was the Raiders were prepared to offer an insane amount of cash. 

I can't blame him for not wanting to work with Mark Davis, of course. Though to be fair, have the Bears of the last few years been n much better?

There's an article on ESPN about the McCaskeys that says they've been pretty heavily influenced by former Bear and current agent Trace Armstrong in several of their past decisions. I haven't had time to read it yet, but it does sound interesting.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. 

Potential franchise QB is also potential massive bust.

I'd add some Bear fans might argue you the "idiot owner" part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, frankw said:

He's going to have his hands more than full in Chicago.

In the last 25 years alone Lovie Smith is the only one to last 5 years or more on the job as head coach for the Bears.

Odds are not in his favor.

Even through different GMs and coaches, Chicago's history at the quarterback position would have to be upgraded massively to qualify as being called "woeful".

I know they have high hopes for Williams, but I'm not sold on him being the answer yet.

(they had high hopes for Fields too, and they could have had Daniels)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Screenshot_20250120_154304.thumb.jpg.d14eb43d531058bb754a0c678a260620.jpg

 

@Mr. Scot I told you. This was the only job that really made sense.

 

This has got to be a massive kick in the you-know-what for Lions fans. I doubt he'll get a welcome reception when he's back inside their stadium next season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...