Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

YES!!! What We've All Been Waiting For! Rookie Jersey Numbers Are Up!


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Well, at least I do... I think I make this post every year with no competition, lol... I've been watching and waiting all weekend, and finally here they are.

SN: Whoever punches in the vitals/info for the roster is out of control,

*Armanti Edwards shrunk since the draft - Had him listed as 6' on Saturday, he is now 5'11".

*Greg Hardy must've made a visit to Dr.Shortt, as he went from 6' even to 6'4" over the weekend as well.

Jimmy Clausen - #2

Armanti Edwards - #10 (Ha, funny he didn't go with one in the 80's eh?)

David Gettis - #12

Greg Hardy - #76 (ick...)

Brandon Lafell - #11

Robert McClain - #36

Eric Norwood - #92

Tony Pike - #16

Jordan Pugh - #29

R.J. Stanford - #35

http://www.panthers.com/team/roster.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy Clausen - #2

Good number for a backup :lol:

Wonder if he'll try to talk Baker out of his #7.

Armanti Edwards - #10 (Ha, funny he didn't go with one in the 80's eh?)

Sorry Ryne. Looks like you're not coming back.

Brandon Lafell - #11

Doubled up his college number.

Greg Hardy - #76

I hate 70 numbers on defensive ends.

(the 90s are all taken, though some of those guys may not last)

Kinda glad Claussen didn't take #17. That would have been weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...