Additions complete; how satisified are you entering 2010?

[ncbobcat]

Unless there is additonal camp bodies or an injury happens, our roster is probably 95%-100% set for camp.

How comfortable are you with the 2010 Panthers?

1) Estatic

2) Happy

3) Satisfied

4) Not enthusiatstic

5) Extremely pissed

Also, at what positions do have you have genuine (not slight) concern at?

-QB

-FB

-WR (including TEs)

-DT

-DE

-DB

Me, I'm happy, but with concerns at FB, DT and DB.

What say you all?

[thefuzz]

I am very happy for the long run, but not really stoked about this upcoming season.

[BF91]

I'm satisfied. One of the things that bothers me is that I'm not a big fan of the Tampa-2/Cover-2 and that's going to be the defense we run this year. Has anybody checked to see how many rushing yards per game the Colts gave up over Meeks' tenure there? Its not pretty, and it won't be here if we build our defense in the Ron Meeks mold.

So yeah, its our defense I'm most worried about, especially our defensive line. I think our LB and DBs will be fine, but if our DL is getting pushed around then our whole defense is going to collapse.

[Ricky Spanish]

I'm satisfied. One of the things that bothers me is that I'm not a big fan of the Tampa-2/Cover-2 and that's going to be the defense we run this year. Has anybody checked to see how many rushing yards per game the Colts gave up over Meeks' tenure there? Its not pretty, and it won't be here if we build our defense in the Ron Meeks mold.

So yeah, its our defense I'm most worried about, especially our defensive line. I think our LB and DBs will be fine, but if our DL is getting pushed around then our whole defense is going to collapse.

i think, like someone else has said, that a great compromise would be meek's secondary mixed with fox's DL ideas. but who knows if fox's version of a DL would work with meek's secondary scheme

[CRA]

Unless there is additonal camp bodies or an injury happens, our roster is probably 95%-100% set for camp.

How comfortable are you with the 2010 Panthers?

1) Estatic

2) Happy

3) Satisfied

4) Not enthusiatstic

5) Extremely pissed

Also, at what positions do have you have genuine (not slight) concern at?

-QB

-FB

-WR (including TEs)

-DT

-DE

-DB

Me, I'm happy, but with concerns at FB, DT and DB.

What say you all?

Short term (2010 season)- 4) Not enthusiastic

Long term - 2) Happy

Concerns -DT, DE - zero proven players. The Tyler Brayton is as proven as it gets and he is the caliber player you patch in to a pretty good line.

DB - depth in general is a concern as well as SS.

[CRA]

i think, like someone else has said, that a great compromise would be meek's secondary mixed with fox's DL ideas. but who knows if fox's version of a DL would work with meek's secondary scheme

Sure it would. Look at Tampa Bay over the years. They were never as weak as Meeks was in Indy against the run.

[Lout]

I'm satisfied. One of the things that bothers me is that I'm not a big fan of the Tampa-2/Cover-2 and that's going to be the defense we run this year. Has anybody checked to see how many rushing yards per game the Colts gave up over Meeks' tenure there? Its not pretty, and it won't be here if we build our defense in the Ron Meeks mold.

So yeah, its our defense I'm most worried about, especially our defensive line. I think our LB and DBs will be fine, but if our DL is getting pushed around then our whole defense is going to collapse.

I bet you didn't realize that we have run a deviation of the cover 2 for the past 7 years.. otherwise you would be indifferent about running the tampa 2 this year. It's basically the same scheme we have run since Fox has been our coach.

[360EASY]

Unless there is additonal camp bodies or an injury happens, our roster is probably 95%-100% set for camp.

How comfortable are you with the 2010 Panthers?

1) Estatic

2) Happy

3) Satisfied

4) Not enthusiatstic

5) Extremely pissed

Also, at what positions do have you have genuine (not slight) concern at?

-QB

-FB

-WR (including TEs)

-DT

-DE

-DB

Me, I'm happy, but with concerns at FB, DT and DB.

What say you all?

im worried DB, FB and most of all DT!!!!! we have to stop the run.....Idk how this lost priority

[Panthro]

Why on earth are you worried about FB.

[BF91]

i think, like someone else has said, that a great compromise would be meek's secondary mixed with fox's DL ideas. but who knows if fox's version of a DL would work with meek's secondary scheme

I'd love that. What I really liked was the Cover-1 we ran towards the end of last year after the pick-up of Hollis Thomas. Given a full year, the difficiencies in pass coverage the Cover-1 has would be exploited though.

I miss Trgovac, or at least his model for our defense. Had I been here when we hired Meeks I would have expressed my dislike for him then.

[ncbobcat]

Short term (2010 season)- 4) Not enthusiastic

Long term - 2) Happy

Concerns -DT, DE - zero proven players. The Tyler Brayton is as proven as it gets and he is the caliber player you patch in to a pretty good line.

DB - depth in general is a concern as well as SS.

So, 8-8 2010?

[ncbobcat]

i'm satisfied. One of the things that bothers me is that i'm not a big fan of the tampa-2/cover-2 and that's going to be the defense we run this year. Has anybody checked to see how many rushing yards per game the colts gave up over meeks' tenure there? Its not pretty, and it won't be here if we build our defense in the ron meeks mold.

So yeah, its our defense i'm most worried about, especially our defensive line. I think our lb and dbs will be fine, but if our dl is getting pushed around then our whole defense is going to collapse.

10-6?

[rayzor]

I miss Trgovac, or at least his model for our defense.

:eek:

one of the best things in years was us losing trgocrap.

[BF91]

I bet you didn't realize that we have run a deviation of the cover 2 for the past 7 years.. otherwise you would be indifferent about running the tampa 2 this year. It's basically the same scheme we have run since Fox has been our coach.

I didn't realize it, thanks for letting me know. Let me clarify then: I don't like Ron Meeks.