Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers #7 in power rankings...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

I 100% agree with you that no one is going to give us those few rare games that Pep was able to deliver.

However, I think the guys we have at DE (Johnson, Brown, Hardy, Brayton, and Norwood on passing downs) will be able to give us solid DE play.

I can agree that those guys can give us some solid play also. I think they need good DT play to assist them and I'm not sure we have that. Brown more so than Johnson maybe.

That said, overall I see the DL being more consistant than last season but last season overall being stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seriously man, the "4th ranked pass D" was greatly inflated b/c teams ran with such ease against us at times last season. We were never great against the run but there were stretches where we were horrible.

Our secondary last year had Godfrey, Harris, and Marshall. None of those have displayed at this point (including last year) that they are that good yet in coverage. So Gamble (who imo is an on and off as Pep sometimes) and that group was the driving force in all our sacks last season?

I think you logic on this one is a little off.

hmm... sounds familiar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't speak for anyone else, but when I look to this upcoming season I see a lot of potential that could result in one of the more exciting seasons we've had in a while.

We are embarking new territory. A new face for a team we haven't yet experienced. Is Matt Moore as good as we've seen in the past? As much as I hope not, will Clausen make that leap? Our O-line now has 4 out of 5 starters in-tact for 2 years straight, the longest in how long? Our defense has 2 young safeties that could bomb, but did show a glimpse of solid play- will it continue? The same applies to the open LB spot. Connor and Anderson made statements to solidify us releasing Diggs... (I know, he was worth keeping. But he's gone, still something to watch this year). Our Dline is a big question mark... We'll have to wait and see what we have... I look forward to it.

And I can't wait to see TC and Armanti Edwards... Perhaps I'm setting myself up for disappointment but damn- how good he can be from the news of how tough he is, catching everything in mini camp, and his speed... We need Lafell to step up, perhaps more wishful thinking, but more likely he won't.. At least right away.

Obviously there is only one way our season will go... But I'm not sold on it being as big of a disappointment as some believe. Perhaps we suck it up, but at this point- I can't wait to watch some Panther football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seriously man, the "4th ranked pass D" was greatly inflated b/c teams ran with such ease against us at times last season. We were never great against the run but there were stretches where we were horrible.

Our secondary last year had Godfrey, Harris, and Marshall. None of those have displayed at this point (including last year) that they are that good yet in coverage. So Gamble (who imo is an on and off as Pep sometimes) and that group was the driving force in all our sacks last season?

I think you logic on this one is a little off.

I disagree about our pass defense being inflated. Many games our run defense was fine in the first half but the lack of depth took over and teams were able to run on us late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im going to quit arguing because its pointless. my whole point is, we were 8-8. not 1-15 or 15-1. we neither had a horrible, or fantastic team. so the freakout about the changes and loss of vets, is annoying. We haven't seen these guys play. People are Assuming that they will be horrible because they haven't been their before. Its wide open either way. our D-line underachieved so now some news guys are in there to pick up the slack. whether they will do a good job or not is unknown, but there certainty isn't a cause for panic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 is a little low, but I pretty much agree with what he said. If not for delhomme last year we would have been 11-5 at least. Once again King proves that he does his research, unlike 90% of sports journalists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how does this change anything I said?? did I say we didn't get sacks? I said most of our sacks were coverage sacks, because I watch the games like everyone else. there were games where the pass rush just didn't get there but the coverage was awesome (4th ranked pass D). coverage sack, no pass rush. so what are you talking about??

If you understand zone then you know that you don't get very many coverage sacks at all. The reality is that you have 2 or 3 seconds to get to the quarterback before players run through a zone and are wide open between the seams. The coverage was actually pretty poor at the beginning of the season with most players out of position. We were 4th because teams ran so freely on us that they didn't need to pass on us that much. Look at the passing attempts and completions rates against us before the bye.

Philly-17-29 for 102 yards- 2TDs, 1INT

ATl- 21 of 27 for 3TDs and 1Int

Dallas- 22 of 33 for 0TD and 0INT

So teams in week 1 through 3 for example completed 67% of their passes, scored 5 TDs and 2 Ints.

You think that was good. As for sacks we generated 2 against the Eagles by Peppers and Louis and 2 against Dallas- Beason and Davis.

Of those 4 none were coverage sacks as linebackers were blitzing, and both of the sacks against Phillly were due to the pass rush.

None of what you said is remotely accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the optimism and the logic behind the ranking. I don't think we will start out a top ten team but we will finish in the top ten. It usually takes our defense and run game a couple games to get the ball rolling.

My concern is injuries. I feel like we have lost a lot of depth at multiple positions, but I do think the Panthers have a great shot at making the playoffs considering we almost did last year with a really tough schedule and an interception-throwing/ game killing machine playing qb. I'm also a little worried about the run defense and pass rush(no not just because Pep is gone, but because our line hasn't been dominate since the Superbowl). I know a lot of us like Everette Brown and Charles Johnson, but for us to make a push in the playoffs they will have to live up to all the expectations. Run defense I am really worried about. I think Leonard and Tank could be good but if one of them gets injured....call Hollis Thomas and draft either Marvin Austin or Robert Quinn next year.

Which reminds me..... I'm pretty excited we have a first rounder next year. I think the talent will be top heavy in next years draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you understand zone then you know that you don't get very many coverage sacks at all. The reality is that you have 2 or 3 seconds to get to the quarterback before players run through a zone and are wide open between the seams. The coverage was actually pretty poor at the beginning of the season with most players out of position. We were 4th because teams ran so freely on us that they didn't need to pass on us that much. Look at the passing attempts and completions rates against us before the bye.

Philly-17-29 for 102 yards- 2TDs, 1INT

ATl- 21 of 27 for 3TDs and 1Int

Dallas- 22 of 33 for 0TD and 0INT

So teams in week 1 through 3 for example completed 67% of their passes, scored 5 TDs and 2 Ints.

You think that was good. As for sacks we generated 2 against the Eagles by Peppers and Louis and 2 against Dallas- Beason and Davis.

Of those 4 none were coverage sacks as linebackers were blitzing, and both of the sacks against Phillly were due to the pass rush.

None of what you said is remotely accurate.

look Im good with the stats. I've seen them. If you watched the games ( i know you did) opposing QBs had ALL DAY to throw. Do you not remember playing Josh Johnson at Tampa having all day to throw but nowhere to go. This happened several times last season. you don't get that from the stats. You get that from watching the game. I have a really good memory, i watch every game like all of us do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

look Im good with the stats. I've seen them. If you watched the games ( i know you did) opposing QBs had ALL DAY to throw. Do you not remember playing Josh Johnson at Tampa having all day to throw but nowhere to go. This happened several times last season. you don't get that from the stats. You get that from watching the game. I have a really good memory, i watch every game like all of us do.

well if you good at stats look at the first 3 games.....

The Panthers D gave up an average of 155 passing yards a game. That looks fantastic just looking at that number......

However, teams were averaging 5.5 yards per carry on the ground during that span. Carolina was allowing a mindblowing 182 yards a game on the ground. Carolina was 0-3 also.

So was the pass defense good? Not at all. Teams were abusing us on the ground and saw little reason to pass. And when they did pass, they completed a high percentage of passes as 55 pointed out.

It is worth noting that Johnson's best completion percentage was achieved against Carolina last year. I'm just saying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

well if you good at stats look at the first 3 games.....

The Panthers D gave up an average of 155 passing yards a game. That looks fantastic just looking at that number......

However, teams were averaging 5.5 yards per carry on the ground during that span. Carolina was allowing a mindblowing 182 yards a game on the ground. Carolina was 0-3 also.

So was the pass defense good? Not at all. Teams were abusing us on the ground and saw little reason to pass. And when they did pass, they completed a high percentage of passes as 55 pointed out.

It is worth noting that Johnson's best completion percentage was achieved against Carolina last year. I'm just saying...

and this relates to the pass rush how?

Link to comment

look Im good with the stats. I've seen them. If you watched the games ( i know you did) opposing QBs had ALL DAY to throw. Do you not remember playing Josh Johnson at Tampa having all day to throw but nowhere to go. This happened several times last season. you don't get that from the stats. You get that from watching the game. I have a really good memory, i watch every game like all of us do.

I won't argue that we didn't get as much pressure as we needed to last year and frankly this year we will get much less. That is my concern about the defense.

As for Johnson he was pretty awful which is why he was replaced by Josh Freeman halfway through the year. I do remember Freeman lighting us up for 300 yards- it is were not for the 5 Ints, we would have lost that game.

But no I don't remember a bunch of coverage sacks or any kind of great coverage for long periods of time at all. In fact I think you must have been drinking more than I was by a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Took cash out for 84 before the usa game. Didn't like the corners. If this one hits will probably put 100 on Arizona to cover and the over against Purdue 
    • This is so much more than rankings.  Got tired of same old topics.  I see the thread beginning, "Breaking News: Panthers...." and then I open it and read the complete title of the thread "...OT Jordan Gross Retires."  So here is something to chew on:  Don't hurt my feelings.  LZ rates the bounty of talent at each position and I provide a quote from his article.  It changed my approach. https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded #1: Edge: Lance predicts the Edge position will, once again, dominate the first round and it is the strongest position.  If the Panthers draft an edge on day 1 or day 2, Wow.  Phillips, Scourton, Princely, Jones, along with Hampton, Gipson, and Incoom.  Personally, I think we are going to let the others grab the Edge players forcing other positions to drop to us.  This strategy does not discount the fact that if a stud edge falls to 19… LZ:  “This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.” #2 Linebacker:  The Panthers added a starting Mike ILB in free agency, but the rest of the roster is depth. The need is for an off-ball LB who can cover.  Since it is my opinion that we draft a STARTER here, I would expect a first- or second-round pick  However, he makes a comment about the depth, suggesting that quality players could be found on early day 3. LZ: “Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.” #3. Interior Offensive Line:  This one surprised me, powered by some guards that could go as early as round 2.  Remember, LZ is rating these positions based on projected starters.  He mentions that Center is strong based on short-armed OTs that will transition to center, claiming that starters can be found into the fifth round.  That is good news for the Panthers, who do not really need an immediate starter, but they need a future starter who can play a few years on a rookie contract. LZ: “Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.” #4. Wide Receiver:   Finding potential starters at WR is probably easier than C, but let’s not assume that WR is not a need in Charlotte.  TMac needs someone who can keep defenses from cheating in coverage.  Coker is very promising, but the others? I get the feeling that they are hoping XL comes around in year 3.  Regardless, if a WR is there that makes them better, they could pull the trigger–again–just not in round 1.  If the Panthers grab a WR, it will be for a 3rd-5th WR, which makes LZ’s comment interesting: LZ:  “In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.” #5 Cornerback:  Yes, we have Horn and Jackson (in his final year at age 29) and Smith-Wade has been fairly good. Thornton was the second-rated rookie CB before his injury last year.  Could we use depth at nickel?  An outside CB?  I think we could add both, frankly. Future starters.  I love the nickel from Duke, who is not mentioned.   LZ:  “The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D'Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It's worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we've ever seen.” #6(T) Safety: This prognosis could be why we re-signed Scott. However, it could also foreshadow why we might take a safety in rounds 1 or 2.  In my view, I think the value at S is not comparable, per round, to the value at other positions.  Remember the comment about moving Smith-Wade to safety?  I wonder if that was a stupid comment or someone in the know spewing inside info.  I want a safety, but I am not crazy about them in this draft. LZ:  “Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I'm also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.” #6 (T) Tight End:  Sadiq is not described as elite, but could be a first-rounder.  Frankly, from the sounds of this, it is either reach for Sadiq in round 1 or wait until round 3.  I am not seeing a TE in this draft.  I know the Panthers want one, but how much?   LZ: (After Sadiq round 1)--We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.” #8 (T) Defensive Line: This group is hard to gauge, and drafting one where the Panthers pick seems a bit awkward on day 1.  Nobody is worth #19 and the elite DTs will be long gone by #53 or whatever.  However, I like some of the second-tier players.  It seems NTs are abundant, but 3Ts are in short supply.  Maybe a player like Holten or Jackson in round 3 or (sleeper) Capehart around 3-4. LZ:  (Borderline first-rounders:  Banks, McDonald, Woods)  “Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2.” #8 (T) Offensive Tackle:  Yikes.  LZ is not really high on this group, and he provides reasons.  My take?  Many are good pass protectors, but struggie in run support. Walker is seeming like a great signing right now.  I think we grab the RT later, but LZ’s comments about mid round talent demonstrates that there is a lot of risk from top to bottom this year.  Personally, I think we might draft Parker early or Crownover later. LZ: Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round. 10: Running Back.  Pass 11.  (Last) Quarterback:  This may be a place to find a developmental gem, an emergency QB who has longshot potential to compete should Bryce fail.  If people feel that this class is as bad as LZ suggests, could a gem fall into undrafted free agent status?   I think I would watch that dynamic. LZ;  Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn't shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.”   READING THE TEA LEAVES:  Of course, this is not to suggest that Lance Zierlein knows all and sees all.  But I will say that he is a good talent evaluator and he talks to the people in the front offices that we do not have access to.  We are often misled by hacks making crap up to get clicks and hits–and this is part of that environment, so “grain of salt.”   After reading this, I had the following thoughts: Taking an OT in round 1 seems like a mistake under most circumstances.  I think we need to find a RT to develop later in the draft.  I think we will add someone like Jude Bowery from Boston College in round 4.  I think we need to look at OT on both sides as if we have 1 year to groom a starter. If there is a run on Edges, a solid WR will be sitting there.  We could have a situation where the BPAs at #19 are either an edge or WR.  How would an elite WR help us?   At safety, if a team falls in love with Oregon FS Thienemen, the lack of depth behind him could force a reach. Could Carolina be that team?   The Panthers signed a decent C to a one-year contract. Centers with eventual starting ability can be found in rounds 3, 4, and even 5. Expect the Panthers to draft a center in round 4.  Yes, round 4.  I even predict Brian Parker from Duke.  Eerie, huh? We will be drafting a LB early, but I am guessing second round.  The next panther starting W ILB is going to be Rodriguez or Golday.  Madly on fire with my specific predictions–in round 2. Tight End?  Unless we dive in early, I do not see the upgrade.  I am willing to predict that we don’t draft a TE. Cornerback:  We will add a CB, probably a nickel (where there is value) late.  Defensive Line: Depending on what happens in round 1, Defensive line could be a late day 2 pick.   This may shock some of you.  I live on the edge.   ROUND 1:  Best value:  Edge, Wide Receiver, Cornerback.  I predict overdrafting OT and a run on edge will drop WRs and maybeCB  lower and a great value could land in our lap.  Could we do it again?  In the words of Brittany Spears, “Oops.” Corner?  Well, I think we will move Smith-Wade to FS at some point.  Smart, calls coverages.  Jackson is gone after 2026. . Get a nickel later, however, unless a stud CB falls. Please don’t draft TE here. Edge?  On paper, we are strong, but you can never have enough pass rushers.  We will leave awesome at one position that we may not have listed as a primary need: Edge, CB, or WR. ROUND 2:  Best Value: Linebacker.  I do not see us drafting another position here.  LB–Hill (longshot), Rodgriguez, Golday. Edge (second tier–Height, Jacas, Moore, Young, Howell–would be hard to overlook, but our GM is a former LB)  S A Haulcy is a darkhorse possibility. ROUND 3:  Best Value:  Defensive line. Halton (OK), Jackson (Fl. St), Durant (Penn State).   ROUND 4:  Best Value: Center.  Slaughter, Hecht, Jones, Lew, Coogan, Jones, Zuhn.  This is the only real option.  We should take our center in round 4. ROUND 5:  Best value:  They will be looking for a developmental OT here if not addressed sooner.  Jude Bowery ((BC), D. Crownover (RT-Tex AM), Wagner (RT-Notre Dame) seem promising.   
    • Spot-on. D-line and FS are much bigger immediate needs than OT or WR. Look at the current roster and the fact that they have not brought in any new players at those positions. 
×
×
  • Create New...