Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Many Sacks Will The Panthers Have In 2010?


KatsAzz

Recommended Posts

last time i checked the weak-side backer is the one away from the tight end barring only if they use a 2 tight end set then he'll play the right ?

Defense right and left is opposite of offense right and left.

ex. Gamble is our LCB while Smith is our RFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DE-Everette Brown: 3-8 (7)

DE-Charles Johnson: 2-5 (5)

DE-Tyler Brayton: 2-5 (5)

DE-Greg Hardy: 1-5 (2)

DE-Hilee Taylor (if he makes the team) 0-2 (1)

DT-Tank Tyler: 0-2 (2)

DT-Louis Leonard: 0-2 (2)

DT-Corvey Irvin: 0-3 (1)

DT-Ed Johnson: 0-2 (1)

DT-Backup (Hayden, Landri, or Neblett) 0-3 (1)

LB-Thomas Davis 1-4 (4)

LB-Jon Beason 0-4 (3)

LB-James Anderson 0-2 (1)

LB-Dan Connor 0-1 (0)

LB-Jamar Williams 0-1 (0)

LB-Eric Norwood 0-3 (2)

DB's 1-5 (2)

TOTAL: 39 scks

Though I can see one of the DE's hitting it off and getting 10. Anywhere between 30-40 I'd say is reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My prediction is Tyler Brayton will lead the team in sacks followed by Charles Johnson, then Beason or Davis. Our LBs our going to have to rush up front a good amount. A few of our dbs are going to have to come up from time to time too, which I hope they do to throw off the offense.

I got Everette Brown getting no more than six sacks. I think anyone who think he is going to land 9-10 is out of their mind; and a complete homer.

Teams are going to run against us, a lot, which will also factor in on our sack total. I don't think we land more than 30, no way, I could see us playing a team like Baltimore and just getting absolutely shut out in the sack department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my dream season listed in descending order of sack totals.

RDE Brown - 10.5 sacks

LDE Johnson - 7 sacks

SLB Norwood - 7 sacks

WLB Davis - 5 sacks

LDE Brayton - 4 sacks

MLB Beason - 3 sacks

RDE Hardy - 3 sacks

NT Tyler - 2 sacks

CB Marshall 2 sacks

UT Leonard - 1 sack

SLB Anderson - 1 sack

SLB Connor - .5 sacks

46 sacks in total. Remember that's a dream season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a real danger sign for the Panthers defense, the veteran DT's, DE's, LB's likely to make their final roster have only a collective career average of 14.03 to 14.33 sacks per season!

On the somewhat positive side, the collective total for their best single season sack totals is 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here's the thing. You compared him to Jake. Jake was signed to the practice squad out of college. Bryce was the number 1 overall. Their expectations are wildly different and so are their contracts. You can talk all you want about what a player is and where they are now and all this other mumbo jumbo, but Jake never had a 5th year option and we weren't talking about the possibility of a top 5 QB contract extension at the end of his 3rd year. What he was expected to be matters because we invested heavily at a cost of future capital, including a 2nd round pick this year, for him to be that guy. The cost to add Bryce took value from the team. To be worth it, he has to add that value back.  Actually, I don't prefer yards, TDs, or only INTs. All those stats by themselves are misleading which is why I said you have to use a lot of different stats. ADOT - Average depth of target.  Completion %. Pretty obvious until you factor in ADOT. 0-5 has a lot higher C% than 10-15%. Hang time. If a pass is in the air for 4.6 seconds vs 3.1 on a 40 yards throw, that gives a DB a lot of time to correct. Is it a loft or is it a laser.  EPA - Expected points added. A way of measuring QB efficiency on every play.  CPOE - ranking pass completions based on several factors, not just the throw.  There's obviously more, but those are the more common.  Typical stats don't show everything. You need to look all over. Looking at a stat line is lazy. That's why I said, you need to analyze everything. Once you start looking at the numbers you start looking at the player. That's why you follow numbers. They lead you places. You look at what happening when the numbers show you patterns. That's where you start finding the problems that yards, TDs and Ints won't show you.     
    • It's not relevant who wins or loses. It's about actually attempting to get better at the position.
    • Thank you. I don't understand how the Bryce stans don't see this. I've never seen a player get more hyped for doing so little. Honestly it's driving me a little insane.
×
×
  • Create New...