Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LB situation


Recommended Posts

Norwood isn't a MLB. He's a pass rusher. Fox has already said he's going to working at both DE and OLB. On top of that, Norwood's game speed is much faster than he recorded 40 time.

That being said, they've already been working with Anderson at SLB, Connor at MLB, and Beason at WLB. The only way I see that shaken up is if Williams plays his ass off at camp and either beats out Anderson or Connor. The same can be said of Norwood too, SLB is basically wide open right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm ok with anderson he's a good player but if norwood can get faster as far as covering i'd want him 2 start..i get wut yur saying about norwood being faster then his 40 time but just watching him last year and in the senior bowl he looked like he could improve..and he's never seen pro WR'S and TE's speed before

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm ok with anderson he's a good player but if norwood can get faster as far as covering i'd want him 2 start..i get wut yur saying about norwood being faster then his 40 time but just watching him last year and in the senior bowl he looked like he could improve..and he's never seen pro WR'S and TE's speed before

Norwood is considered decent in tackling skills and quick off the edge. His specific weaknesses are in coverage where he is considered average or below. If he plays linebacker for us it will be primarily as a role player and a pass rusher not as a Sam playing TEs in coverage. At this point he isn't as good as Anderson or Williams but provides depth and some utility as an edge rusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of these guys will get a fair amount of playing time. We have quality back ups so they will keep a good rotation that will keeep everyone well rested I think. I just don't know who is going to play relief for Connor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...