Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shemar Stewart Discussion


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I don't know how I feel about that.  He turned heads at the SR bowl and looked very fast in his new body (265 lbs).  He turned heads at the combine.   I figured he would shoot up boards.  When asked about his sack total, he called himself, "an all-around player who focused on being the best player for his team, not just chasing sacks," fwiw.

Oh, and another example of a player with no real production in college who had double digit sacks in the NFL:  

Odafe Oweh 

Penn State player who didn't have a sack in his last season, but was drafted by the Ravens in 2022 and had 10 sacks in 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I don't know how I feel about that.  He turned heads at the SR bowl and looked very fast in his new body (265 lbs).  He turned heads at the combine.   I figured he would shoot up boards.  When asked about his sack total, he called himself, "an all-around player who focused on being the best player for his team, not just chasing sacks," fwiw.

Oh, and another example of a player with no real production in college who had double digit sacks in the NFL:  

Odafe Oweh 

Penn State player who didn't have a sack in his last season, but was drafted by the Ravens in 2022 and had 10 sacks in 2024.

It looks at first glance that PFF really downgraded Graham after the combine.  I seriously doubt he goes past us in any scenario.  If morgan wants dawgs then this kid is the alpha dog of the draft.  Hes not sexy but your defense gets immediately better the second you draft him.  He and walker would change the tone of the defense from the jump.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

You mean like Danielle Hunter who had 4.5 sacks in three years at LSU and has had 37 sacks over the last three years in the NFL?  In fact, he has 99.5 for his career.

I can go down the list with double digit sacks in college and give you a list of busts.  Stewart has dropped 30 pounds.  He has athleticism.

So one. Who was a third round pick because of his lack of college production. If we're talking third round this becomes a completely different risk/reward conversation.

The one thing the vast majority of NFL busts have in common is that they had the athleticism.

Every year around this time people fall in love with athletic freaks who didn't produce and the one thing most of them have in common is that they will go on to continue not producing in the NFL. It's rare for guys to see their production increase at a higher level of competition. Not non-existent but definitely far from the norm.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Guy sounds like the next Everette Brown if we end up drafting him...

Nah. I’m not a fan of us picking Stewart ahead of say…pick 25. But he’s going to give you more than Brown. He’s going to be able to hold the edge and give you some pressures because of his size, power, athleticism, and effort. He’s a real NFL player, he just isn’t a premier pass rusher because he doesn’t have that win instantly outside move. Brown was a lil guy with a good spin move that didn’t work against NFL OT with NFL OT reach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I don't know how I feel about that.  He turned heads at the SR bowl and looked very fast in his new body (265 lbs).  He turned heads at the combine.   I figured he would shoot up boards.  When asked about his sack total, he called himself, "an all-around player who focused on being the best player for his team, not just chasing sacks," fwiw.

Oh, and another example of a player with no real production in college who had double digit sacks in the NFL:  

Odafe Oweh 

Penn State player who didn't have a sack in his last season, but was drafted by the Ravens in 2022 and had 10 sacks in 2024.

First rounder, but not a top 10 pick. Pick 31 I think? Different ball game. Top 10 pick…. you got to hit the sure thing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me Stewart over Graham all day. I’ve watched Graham’s highlights, and there are a couple DTs in this draft I’d take over him. Compare hit tape to Derrick Brown’s or Jalen Carter’s college tape. Those guys jump off the film as top 10 interior DL plus had the measurables to boot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Give me Stewart over Graham all day. I’ve watched Graham’s highlights, and there are a couple DTs in this draft I’d take over him. Compare hit tape to Derrick Brown’s or Jalen Carter’s college tape. Those guys jump off the film as top 10 interior DL plus had the measurables to boot. 

I get its your take and your opinion but just understand you are in the extreme minority thinking this

 

this kid is a beast

 

the play at 9:25, Jesus

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I get its your take and your opinion but just understand you are in the extreme minority thinking this

 

this kid is a beast

 

the play at 9:25, Jesus

I think he’ll do well as a 3Tech but it’s not a scheme fit for us…right now., unless we plan on transitioning back to 4-3. He’s not a 2 gapper.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

You mean like Danielle Hunter who had 4.5 sacks in three years at LSU and has had 37 sacks over the last three years in the NFL?  In fact, he has 99.5 for his career.

I can go down the list with double digit sacks in college and give you a list of busts.  Stewart has dropped 30 pounds.  He has athleticism.

Just to play devils advocate, Danielle Hunter was pick #88.. Picking a player similar to Hunter’s profile at pick 8 is extremely risky. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It looks at first glance that PFF really downgraded Graham after the combine.  I seriously doubt he goes past us in any scenario.  If morgan wants dawgs then this kid is the alpha dog of the draft.  Hes not sexy but your defense gets immediately better the second you draft him.  He and walker would change the tone of the defense from the jump.

I think he is one of the "4 blue chip players" in this draft the scout was talking about.  (Carter, Hunter, Graham, and the fourth could be any number of players-personally, I am thinking there are only 3)

Graham is the safe bet, and you run to the podium with that pick, even though nobody runs to the podium any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

First rounder, but not a top 10 pick. Pick 31 I think? Different ball game. Top 10 pick…. you got to hit the sure thing. 

Too much risk--but I see what they are talking about.  I have not heard the cliche "workout warrior" any more, and he could be just that.  If he is anything close to Myles Garrett, you take him.  If he is anything like YGM, you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

I think he’ll do well as a 3Tech but it’s not a scheme fit for us…right now., unless we plan on transitioning back to 4-3. He’s not a 2 gapper.

I see that, but I am guessing that we will upgrade Robinson and add a 2 gapper.  I could be way off, and getting the DL right could be viewed by Morgan as a 2-year process since we have Robinson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Just to play devils advocate, Danielle Hunter was pick #88.. Picking a player similar to Hunter’s profile at pick 8 is extremely risky. 

That is why you have to pass on his potential and take something more established.  I have already said that I would not take him at #8---but dropping 20+ pounds can add a lot of speed--but it is still a risk we cannot afford to take. I thought (when I first expressed interest in him at 280) that he was doing what he did at the SR Bowl at nearly 300.  He could hold the edge and move inside on some downs.  Still, I think sacks are not a good stat because some, like Burns, throw caution to the wind and go for sacks.  I have even seen some of these elite pass rushers stop or quit when they get stonewalled, instead of pursuing the play until the whistle. I have seen people get sacks when 2 other teammates pressured the QB to the player who makes the stop as the third to arrive at the party.   

Pressures is a better stat.   asked for one player with double digits sacks who was not a sack master in college, and without digging, I have 2.   Linville is basically right and I get the point he is making--but my point was accurate.  He asked for one name and I gave him 2 by thinking back and then  checking stats.  It is not common and we cannot take risks.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...