Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 50 Running Backs

Carolina Crazy V2

Recommended Posts

panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

MY personal opinion is go with top 20 backs and do better research. I can find no stated or implied rationale for your list. Surely it isn't yards per carry or AP would be around 20 and not 1. Also some of the commentary is way off. For example you say that CJ's yards per carry were in large part due to his offensive line. That isn't necessarily the case as over 1000 of his 2000 yards were gained after contact by the defense. Here are a few links which shed light on the issue.

http://stats-dont-lie.blogspot.com/2010/01/look-at-yards-gained-after-contact-for.html

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_position.php?tab=by_position&season=2009&pos=HB&stype=r&runpass=&teamid=-1&numsnaps=25&numgames=1

Even with Williams and Stewart the order should be reversed. Granted Williams had 1/10 of a yard more per carry but if you look at yards after contact, Stewart gained an average of 3.3 while Williams gained 2.6. And Stewart caused 44 missed tackles while Williams caused 27.n The one area that Williams did better was blocking which wasn't mentioned.

Honestly if this list was based on who did the best per opportunity, Jamal Charles should be number 1 not number 10. Certainly he shouldn't be below 3 IMO.

I am not trying to give you grief but you asked for constructive criticism. I give you an A for ambition and willingness to stick your neck out but honestly you need to state your criteria for rating them up front so people have a perspective for agreeing or disagreeing. Like rate them on elusiveness or power or who will get the most yards per carry or even total yards rather than just top 50 backs for 2010. It is too subjective and random for comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

CJ should be top of the board, but personally I don't think any rookies, at this point, should be ranked any higher than Vets, even sophomores.

Agree with the rookies. Don't know why you would rank rookies at all at this point. They haven't done anything to rate them on. That could be another good article on who among the rookies will have the best year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

rice and drew? maybe.

Adrian Peterson isn't even a top 5 running back anymore. Yeah he might give you a highlight real stiff arm or run every now and then, but then 2 plays later cough the ball up. If he fixes his fumbling problem he can take back #1 again, until then there are running backs that might not have his insane genetics but don't give the ball away all the time.

edit- Rice, Drew, Johnson, and DWill all run without a hall of fame quarterback sitting behind them, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

Looking at Peterson's number of carries, can't help but wonder if Fox is smarter than most coaches regarding how he has used Stewart and Williams. Peterson is getting 350 or so carries a year compared with Williams 200+. Peterson seemed to be running out of gas towards the end of last season. Maybe he was overused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...