Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who made beason apologize to TO and Why?


CatfanMO

Recommended Posts

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement. He never said HE didn't want TO but said that based on the philosophy of the FO, that TO wouldn't be a Panther due to locker room issues "for whatever reason". People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement. He never said HE didn't want TO but said that based on the philosophy of the FO, that TO wouldn't be a Panther due to locker room issues "for whatever reason". People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Welcome to the world of blogs. Reading comprehension needs to be sacrificed in order to fill up the blog with news everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement....People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Panthers LB Jon Beason said he’s sorry about his comments concerning Terrell Owens, in which he objected to the receiver’s possible presence in Carolina.

“I have to apologize for my comments regarding TO,” Beason wrote. “I personally would want him on our team in Carolina. He’s been a great WR for a very long time and will without a doubt be a hall of famer.

what was that about no reading comprehension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm willing to bet it was the panthers front office.

Highly unlikely.

The safer bet is this guy.

648a25798c5af17ab9385cf508eb0ed0.jpg

Rosenhaus represents both Beason and Owens. Right now, he's having a hard enough time finding work for Owens. He certainly didn't need statements like the ones Beason made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

now this is didn't know. i don't keep up with agents.

it makes sense.

Pretty much.

Owens isn't what he once was on the field, and that was the only thing that made teams willing to try to put up with his antics.

Nobody thinks he's worth it anymore, especially not at the salary he wants (5 million a year).

Beyond that, given their philosophy this season, even if Owens weren't a locker room cancer I seriously doubt the Panthers would look at him.

(someone will probably come on and argue that they should, but there's really no good logic behind that idea at all)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what was that about no reading comprehension?

The original comment needed no apology. The reading comprehension came from that. He apologized for how it came across because people "read into" his comments. Any intelligent poster on here who has SOME knowledge of how the Panthers' organization works, knows that TO would never come here - Beason pretty much stated that ownership wouldn't bring him in.

He didn't diss TO - actually, he kind of defended him by saying "for whatever reason" that TO was a locker room distraction. He didn't say "TO is a locker room distraction", just a perception that Beason didn't really know why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...