Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mikko To Dallas

carpanfan96
 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Can't fault the front office for trying - we weren't going to keep Necas past this year anyway. If anything, better for it to happen now than give the bum 13 mill over 8 years for him to be a cone out there

The trying is nice but this is two straight failures.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
Just now, KillerKat said:

Like hell you cant! Shouldve gotten a ball park figure from him before making the trade. 

Sure, and he could say 1 thing (I'll sign for you for 13 mill AAV for 7 years) and then get here and say something different (I want 15 mill AAV for 8 years). Seems like Rantonen and his agent aren't the most trustworthy dues

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

The trying is nice but this is two straight failures.

The Guentzel failure is much, much worse than this IMO. Guentzel wanted to seemingly be here and our front office tried to play hardball and it blew up in their face. Rantanen just does not want to play here unless we give him more than apparently any other team needs to

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)

Two late firsts and a 5’8” center.

This team just got set back years…. Necas could have pulled that at the deadline next year with an extension.

It’ll take two years for this team to be a contender again and that’s IF Nadeau and Nikishin come as advertised.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

So seeing Stankoven and two first round picks… huge meh.

Yeah, Stankoven is pretty awful and I think Dallas doesn't have a 1st this year, so it will be future firsts. Awful value - I'd rather just keep Rantanen here the rest of the year, tie him to the goal posts, and have everyone on our team take turns spearing him

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stumpy Grand Master

Stumpy

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Sounds like it's going to be Stankoven and 2 future firsts from what I've seen on Reddit. Absolutely terrible return, but unfortunately we didn't have a choice

 

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

So seeing Stankoven and two first round picks… huge meh.

Nothing final yet, but...

Screenshot_20250307_132317_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...