I'd like to see......

[Zod]

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

[pantherdad]

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherclaw

The tight ends don't make up for a good, consistent receiver other than steve smith.

You don't think Rosario and Barnidge have come far enough along to become receiving threats along with Smith? Thats what I'm saying.... You get those TE's involved more,(particularly Rosario and Barnidge, King is your blocker) get some consistancy going with some short passes, then when the TE's get more attention than they should, he is gonna hit Smith with the kiss of death, everytime. (don't forget, we are still gonna run the ball like crazy)

This, from a few topics above. great minds must think alike.....

[Lumps]

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

[Captroop]

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

That's ridiculous. Everyone knows Jolie prefers to be spread out wide. I would, however, like to play QB and have Scarlett be my Center.

[Jangler]

I want a formation with Jennifer Aniston and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and Lea Michele and Roselyn Sanchez in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

fixed

[pantherclaw]

Pantherdad flappin his gums, when he completely missed the point of the post he quoted. Good stuff. Flap them some more.

[Zod]

fixed

yes, you definitely should be before you get your hands on that beiber kid.

[pantherdad]

Pantherdad flappin his gums, when he completely missed the point of the post he quoted. Good stuff. Flap them some more.

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

[Khyber53]

They used to run a tight end-heavy formation called "The Jumbo Package" for running plays. If they could just do the same, but add the possibility of a pass... could be something special.

[Raskle]

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

[pantherdad]

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

yeah, i made a similar post on another thread....and it spilled over to this thread because of the similarity of the TE talk. so, no, i did not pull this out of context. i posted on the other thread that i would love to see consistant TE play incorporated with the WR position. how is that out of context. I'm sure pantherclawz is a big boy, he doesn't need you to hold his hand or be his message board back up.

[Raskle]

Whatever you say Chief...

[pantherclaw]

Somebody needs a lil nappy poo.

[Jangler]

I'll wait until after dinner, but thanks for the offer.