Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'd like to see......

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pantherdad Rising Star

pantherdad

Posted
Posted

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherclaw

The tight ends don't make up for a good, consistent receiver other than steve smith.

You don't think Rosario and Barnidge have come far enough along to become receiving threats along with Smith? Thats what I'm saying.... You get those TE's involved more,(particularly Rosario and Barnidge, King is your blocker) get some consistancy going with some short passes, then when the TE's get more attention than they should, he is gonna hit Smith with the kiss of death, everytime. (don't forget, we are still gonna run the ball like crazy)

This, from a few topics above. great minds must think alike.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

That's ridiculous. Everyone knows Jolie prefers to be spread out wide. I would, however, like to play QB and have Scarlett be my Center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherdad Rising Star

pantherdad

Posted
Posted

Pantherdad flappin his gums, when he completely missed the point of the post he quoted. Good stuff. Flap them some more.

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raskle Contributor

Raskle

Posted
Posted

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

:rolleyes:

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherdad Rising Star

pantherdad

Posted
Posted

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

:rolleyes:

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

yeah, i made a similar post on another thread....and it spilled over to this thread because of the similarity of the TE talk. so, no, i did not pull this out of context. i posted on the other thread that i would love to see consistant TE play incorporated with the WR position. how is that out of context. I'm sure pantherclawz is a big boy, he doesn't need you to hold his hand or be his message board back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Lowest Yards Per Completion...All Time.

      By Waldo · Posted

      The Urban and Reich seasons were epic NFL failures for completely different reasons while also linking these 2 QBs. Wasn't Reich fired earlier in the season by a game or something?  Trevor's bust to Youngs bust is interesting and obviously I would take the former 10 out of 10 times. Still, Trevor has only had 1 game over .500 in a season until this year when playing. What I am saying is that that HC is winning with what he has, which isn't perfect, and in a place that scrapping 9 games together is not a given...usually with help from  another QB along the way. And that's in the AFC South. And the Jags are actually paying their QB vs us hopefully dodging a horrendous 5th option. So that's a lot tougher than what it cost to field Young this year or next. I wasn't really trying to prop up Lawrence but Coen. Dude is doing good work and it showed when Carolina played them. The difference between him and DC is like Lawrence and Young at the minimum IMO. 
    • onmyown
      Would you swap keeping Burns for Horn?

      By onmyown · Posted

      With the Evro’s scheme? Burns all day.
    • Shocker
      Would you swap keeping Burns for Horn?

      By Shocker · Posted

      You mean after a Time Machine is invented?
×
×
  • Create New...