Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How do I know you're real? (No idiots please....please)


Awesomeness!!

Recommended Posts

Itss called Solipsism. ITs basically a theory that the only person that is sure to exist....is me. I can preceive myself, therefore, I must exist. Even if I 'really' exist in another reality (maybe this life is a simulation or a game) I still must exist. You, and everything else in this life or reality, I can't be so sure. Anyone that has ever downloaded a FPS, and palyed, in a typical game with 12 players, 3 of them will be bots. The bots are sometime more intelligent than the actual players.

Anyway, I encourage you to google 'solipsism' and the 'simulation theory' if you're bored or whatever. Its good to think about..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we've all had the thought at one point. I remember I had an epiphany back in high school while playing XBox. When I was finished with it, I just cut it off. Once I cut it off, it was done. That made me wonder, what if that is how we are? One day, we cut off, and after that, all we are is a memory to the small part of the world that knew us. Sad thought, really.

In reality, something has to be real. But this could all just be somebody's dream. Man it is confusing. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read an article a few days ago that places like Seattle green bay and a few others are revoking tickets rights to holders that sell 100% of their tickets. That would do a lot of good league wide for bringing back some home field advantages. We aren't the only team who's stadiums get over run by visitors. It happens basically everywhere. That would go a long way to bringing ticket costs down 
    • yeah, you can basically copy and paste my thoughts from this time last year.   We are building an O more suited for Jake Delhomme than Bryce Young.  Tmac and XL sound great for the downfield gunslinger  Give them opportunities to make plays.  From what I have seen, and the scouting stuff I have read.....TMac does not project as a get open quick WR.  He is going to have to work on getting off the line at this level, getting open, etc.  Which is all good.  This you go to think people will be studs out the gate or you are hater logic just ain't what I do.   Take my XL stance last year.  I lobbied hard for him.  When we drafted him I immediately told folks to pump their breaks on the wild expectations.    If XL legitimately turned into what I think he can be.....his best setup in the league would not be paired w/ a QB like Young.  if Bryce was going to be the dude, I would have lobbied for Ladd vs XL.  I was an XL guy.   And again, I would have gone Warren/Jeanty this draft.   I would have invested in small ball talent for him to be the PG for. 
    • @TheBigKatare you going to Arizona? I'm thinking about making a road trip again. Haven't venture out since we got spanked in Miami a couple years ago
×
×
  • Create New...