Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kalil's value has been set


Murph

Recommended Posts

5 years 50 million for Mangold. Damn. Jordan Gross' contract is only one and half years old and it was 6 years/60 million. Is the current value of a center only one and half years behind a LT? Obviously not but the market has been set. I fear Ryan will be gone next March.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AmxjPJh0ZWJwgi0MpfKbqLg5nYcB?slug=ap-jets-mangoldsdeal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't know much about how the cap works and what nots... but why wouldn't they keep him? i know its a lot of money, but on the other hand great centers dont end up on the pathers every day! who would we be loosing at loosing if we kept him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no way he will demand a contract like mangold did either.

of course not.Kalil is not the best Center in the league.

but JR not re-signing anyone untill this CBA is in order could backfire with some good players walking. I hope it does not happen but its very possible it does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalil is one of the best center's in the league. He will get paid like it.. but I think he gets paid just under what Mangold got. Kalil will be re-signed with us. No doubt. Thomas Davis was a top priority but I don't think he will be anymore after his 2nd knee surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...