Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

crazy idea for panthers!

jeffking

By jeffking,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jeffking Newbie

jeffking

Posted
Posted

what if we had a double shotgun with clausen and matt moore back there where they could snap it to either and then they could just bomb it to smitty? it could also work with a bomb to lafell. or send armanti edwards on a wide receiver reverse. i know im such a dork! but it could work!! it would def keep these defenses on their toes. just sayin. thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

I don't understand the purpose of having two pure qb's in a shotgun. Neither would be a threat to run really and the blitzing defense would be able to see which one had the ball from the snap. One or the other with Armanti back there, or a backfield of Stewart, Deangelo, and Armanti would be ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Its The Milk Newbie

Its The Milk

Posted
Posted

I'm not trying to mean but how exactly would that work? Essentially you are just removing a player that could actually do something for one of the QB's that can't block. If Matt Moore gets the snap then what is Jimmy supposed to do? This also removes the ability to run because the defense knows you are going to pass and you are a receiver down. This idea confuses me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoodsonIsAwesome Newbie

GoodsonIsAwesome

Posted
Posted

It actually sounds so crazy it might work!! I think with Clausens accuracy and Moore's rocket arm for the deep ball we could really keep teams off balance. Any time we wanna throw it short we hike it to Clausen and anytime we wanna throw a deep bomb to Smitty we hike it to Matty. Although sometimes we would have to change it up to keep the defense from figuring it out (kind of like a fake out). The only thing I would change is I would send Goodson long a lot since he's so fast and awesome!!! I bet if we did that Goodson could have at least 25 TD's this year and everyone would want him on their fantasy team!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted

No it won't work, putting your only 2 QB's that will be active in at the same time, is just crazy! Teams will continue to blanket Smitty, Lafell can't catch a screen pass much less a "bomb" and AE is scared to death, after being decleated on that hit in the Ravens game. I really hope you are joking about this lame idea!?

:out:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

It actually sounds so crazy it might work!! I think with Clausens accuracy and Moore's rocket arm for the deep ball we could really keep teams off balance. Any time we wanna throw it short we hike it to Clausen and anytime we wanna throw a deep bomb to Smitty we hike it to Matty. Although sometimes we would have to change it up to keep the defense from figuring it out (kind of like a fake out). The only thing I would change is I would send Goodson long a lot since he's so fast and awesome!!! I bet if we did that Goodson could have at least 25 TD's this year and everyone would want him on their fantasy team!!

Are you a family friend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

what if we had a double shotgun with clausen and matt moore back there where they could snap it to either and then they could just bomb it to smitty? it could also work with a bomb to lafell. or send armanti edwards on a wide receiver reverse. i know im such a dork! but it could work!! it would def keep these defenses on their toes. just sayin. thoughts?

oh lol i get jokes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

It actually sounds so crazy it might work!! I think with Clausens accuracy and Moore's rocket arm for the deep ball we could really keep teams off balance. Any time we wanna throw it short we hike it to Clausen and anytime we wanna throw a deep bomb to Smitty we hike it to Matty. Although sometimes we would have to change it up to keep the defense from figuring it out (kind of like a fake out). The only thing I would change is I would send Goodson long a lot since he's so fast and awesome!!! I bet if we did that Goodson could have at least 25 TD's this year and everyone would want him on their fantasy team!!

these words would cause suicide if a real football person read them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By frankw · Posted

      This is one of my key concerns lost in the sauce that is the neverending conversation about him evading pressure and the OL. Eventually any QB is going to have to step up into the pocket and show the defense they can still beat them even if they get through. We have a limited QB who cannot consistently do this and as such we are relegated to going back and forth about how successful he was at evading pressure but we have little else to write home about. Tyler Shough stepped up into the pocket and made plays despite being pressured and sacked. He's played in about 35 less games than Bryce Young. That is a problem. And isn't just going to go away. The Bucs are going to do the same thing after watching the film.
    • Stumpy
      Canes vs Lightning 7pm

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Oh, absolutely! That doesn't absolve the absolute dogshit hockey that the team played in front of him, though. Only Cane that played well tonight was Bradly Nadeau.
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Thanks for illustrating my point.  No one in the last several pages of this discussion is suggesting we should hang on to him, but anytime someone says anything less than "take him out back and shoot him" you act like they are. That's either you not understanding what you're reading or just being a nimrod because you can't keep up. (I would have said 'or just sh-tposting' but you're way too emotional on this topic for that) Either way, the result is the same 😆
×
×
  • Create New...