Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lafell Locked Up As #2?


weyco2000

Recommended Posts

I think Smitty #1 and Lafell #2(due to Lafell not playing) and I would say that was a signal to DJ, however with one catch for 8 yds. (his avg.) I would expect Jarrrett to be waived. I also think Moore will be kept along with Gettis.

I expect Edwards to be the emergency #3 QB and I think Guy makes it, because of ST play, I know he didn't play....maybe we don't know something?;) Anyway you wouldn't put Jarrett in the game, if he was a lock.:eek:

WR #1 - Smith - Moore - Edwards

WR #2 - Lafell - Gettis - Guy

(Lafell did play and was targeted once) DJ ran a third and ten in route, 2 yds short, which pretty much sums up his carrer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell did not drop one ball last night.The guy barely played how did he lock up a position?

...i think the OP is saying the less a guy played last night the more secure his spot is...except armanti...that was a little "leak" to the giants...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lafell, Gettis and Edwards all also do something very important as receivers on this team that Jarrett never seems to do: they look to make contact and block in the running game. They might not get tangled up each time, but I did notice that Gettis and Edwards were out there trying to help when they could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually would agree with the OP... just because he was only targeted once and didn't catch it doesn't mean he hasn't secured that #2 spot. The actual reason for him only being targeted once is because he wasn't in the game long enough to catch more passes. Which would lead me to believe that Fox pulled him early because he plans on having him line up opposite Steve Smith in week 1. I actually think Lafell will do ok once Smith gets back in the line up. He'll have more time to get open since most of the coverage will float towards Smith and he'll have a lot of one on one situations. He does need to work on his hand-eye coordination though.

Steve Smith, Brandon Lafell, Dwayne Jarrett, David Gettis, Charly Martin

and either Trent Guy or Kenny Moore will be #6 should they choose to have 6. But at this point, I just don't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow. Florida two years in a row heading to the ECF. Great goalie play in Bob and scoring.  We had a better team but were worse in goal.  We owned them in the regular season. Just shows what elite goalie play looks like.     bob vs Igor.  At what point does rod just roll with Koochie.  This is our future being fuged over by stubborn rod.  
    • I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Cousins' Achilles rehab isn't going great because the Penix pick honestly felt like a panic move. But then again, the Packers have probably had the best QB play in the NFL over the past 30 years with Favre and then Rodgers and now Love showed great promise last year. They didn't need a QB when they drafted both Rodgers and Love and both guys sat for multiple years. The strategy has been working. Maybe the Falcons are trying to recreate that?
    • First off...you missed the point of what I said. All I said was the offense could be setup to not have to rely on bryce in the same manner as other qbs if its working. And Yes the rest aren't proven commodities but NEITHER is bryce so I don't understand what you are getting at there. Lastly what is with this questioning of if bryce is liked? Liked how? Personal or football? See thats the problem with fans like you, you are so invested in a individual you respond to any critsicm with "do you like him". My opinion on bryce is strictly football....I DONT KNOW BRYCE PERSONALLY so I don't have anything against him in that regard. Far as football I said from the start I didn't see him as a top nfl Qb and he hasn't shown me anything so far to say I was wrong so based off your question...no. Just like everybody else on here, it's strictly football. Asking if he is liked in that regard, it's clearly no. He hasn't shown enough to be liked on the field.   
×
×
  • Create New...