Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coffee Makers


LifeisaGarden

Recommended Posts

I bought a Krups coffee maker 3 years ago and it is one of the best I've ever owned. I paid about $90 for it. It does the auto brew thing, auto shut off, and it has a liquid detector so it doesn't turn on when there's no water. When I get home I'll get the model number.

Stay away from Black and Decker. I went through 3 in a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!

I was thinking about a Keurig. Dan has 2 in his workplace and they both get used 20-30+ times a day. Not sure if I'm willing to do the pod or cup thing though.

that stuff is great but it gets expensive quickly. In my experience you can't go wrong with a Krups but I've had a Black and Decker for a few years with no problems. Gets used every day. The only thing it doesn't have is a thermal carafe which I love but can live without.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those Keurigs are awesome! Guy across the hall from at work has one and always has a cupboard full of different coffees!!!

I rarely make coffee at home,but I have a Hamilton Beach. Nice thing is it has a stainless carafe, so there's no burner, = no burnt coffee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heard nothing but good things about this, almost bought one a couple of weeks ago just couldn't justify it.

http://www.amazon.com/Zojirushi-EC-BD15BAFresh-Thermal-Carafe-Coffee/dp/B0000X7CMQ/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1284223396&sr=8-4

41X4PVRHKWL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

That brand was one of the better brands when I did some research on coffee makers a while ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...