Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore


34cpantherman28

Recommended Posts

I don't see why everyone is freaking out over the game today, sure there were some bad parts. Moore's performance definitely could have been much better, but it's a starting point.

My view is that you can't really blame him for all the picks; receivers just weren't getting open for the most part and they were forced to abandon the run. It just seems a little harsh to blame all of those ints on him and judge him from the first game of the season.

Either way, it is a starting point and gives them something to build off of and I feel that they will. You can't judge a team by one game, especially not the first game of the season. We still have 15 more to go and it is far from over, hopefully Moore can prove himself over the next few weeks and our passing game and o-line improves and gels together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm one of the biggest Moore fans out there and I really want him to succeed, but all of those picks were terrible choices on his part. Lobbing a ball into quadruple coverage isn't going to end well for anybody (unless you're the team with the quad coverage), I don't know what he was thinking. He should have thrown those balls away, but he didn't. Piss poor decisions like that cost us the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why everyone is freaking out over the game today, sure there were some bad parts. Moore's performance definitely could have been much better, but it's a starting point.

My view is that you can't really blame him for all the picks; receivers just weren't getting open for the most part and they were forced to abandon the run. It just seems a little harsh to blame all of those ints on him and judge him from the first game of the season.

Either way, it is a starting point and gives them something to build off of and I feel that they will. You can't judge a team by one game, especially not the first game of the season. We still have 15 more to go and it is far from over, hopefully Moore can prove himself over the next few weeks and our passing game and o-line improves and gels togeher

They were his fault, he lobbed 2 to covered receivers and threw 1 off his back foot to the middle of the field. Last year he was throwing the ball, now he's aiming the ball. Sure the OL played liked crap, but he had time on 2 of those throws and he should have thrown the other away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore made some HORRIBLE decisions today.... there is no way anybody can defend some of those throws, starting with that first pick. There were 4 defenders and 1 WR. That being said, the protection broke down in the 2nd half, there was no running game today and absolutely zero pressure from the defense.

Bottom line for me is Matt Moore will only be a good QB when the RB's run for 150+ yards a game, other than that I am still not sold on him until he proves me wrong otherwise. He still is no worse than Jake was last year :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pytor kochetkov assigned to Chicago for conditioning stint. Wonder if he gets playing time in the playoffs if Bussi or Freddy flounders 
    • What specific LT at 19 are all of the OT Stan’s wanting? Be specific. All have issues and are not guaranteed to improve the OL.. The chances of one of these LT’s who are projected at 19 (Proctor, Lomu) being a bust is much higher than a guy like Lemon/Concepcion imo. Do you really want to draft a kid who has weight struggles along with lateral movement issues? And the other who was a shitty run blocker vs Big 12 competition? Morgan and Co. want to see how Rasheed Walker plays.. They also want to see how Icky’s rehab goes.. There’s a lot of  “wait and see at OT”  We don’t have the luxury for our 1st round pick being a backup. We lack top end talent. Morgan and the others have made it known they want to win now. For that reason, I’m almost positive we punt on OT in the first this year and worry about it next year in the first round if need be.    Thieneman would be ideal. He’s a natural “center field” safety with great coverage skills. For the posters who want trade up for Downs…Do you realize he struggles in coverage? He’s more of a box safety. We already have two of those players.. I wouldn’t mind trading in front of the Vikings for the Thieneman though.. Next need would be DT, but I don’t see the value there at 19.. Same with edge. WR at #19 is very realistic. Who would improve this team more than Lemon/Concepcion? You could argue a slot CB, but the value isn’t great there either. People tend to forget the Seattle Seahawks game.. Yes BY sucked, but no one was getting open.. We could use a quick savvy route runner to beat man coverage. TMAC and Coker are great, but consistently creating separation vs Man Coverage is not their strength. 
    • Freddie owned this game. My 1st star.
×
×
  • Create New...