Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who will be the next undrafted rookie pick up this year to be dubbed "THE FUTURE"


frash.exe

Who's the FUTURE OF PANTHERS QBING YEA!!!  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's the FUTURE OF PANTHERS QBING YEA!!!

    • Chris “Ivy League” Pizzotti-Harvard
      0
    • Rudy “not the one who went to Notre Dame that they made a movie about” Carpenter- AZ St.
    • John Parker “F. Murray Abraham etc etc datta da da too many names” Wilson-Alabama
    • Stephen “Tits” McGee (watch Anchorman if you don’t get it)
    • Drew “Nilly” Willy-Buffalo
    • Brian “drove my chevy to the levee but the levee was Bri” Hoyer-Mich St.
    • Mike “representin Dirty Jerz” Teel-Rutgers
    • Todd “Broke Man” Boeckman-Ohio St.
    • Patrick “Moo” Cowan-UCLA
    • write in (please specify in your post


Recommended Posts

I'm sick of how this team runs their QB systems. I understand the philosophy of not drafting QBs high because you pay them a lot and then they could bust. But the QBs that bust like that are normally on teams that are for the most part not well-coached and they aren't given the luxury of sitting behind a vet. These QBs are ranked higher than the other guys for a reason...I know every once in a while you hit a diamond in the rough with a guy like Brady but what other 6th rounder, 7th rounder, or undrafted FA has ever one a super bowl?? And from the looks of it....the Pats just know what the hell to do with a QB because Cassell had arguably a better first season (stats) than Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...