Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Keep davidson for the offense. Hire.......


Fiz

Recommended Posts

For clausen's sake.

that would be the only reason...

and I would still be extremely concerned.. but yeah, I can't deny that Clausen is use to this type of system and due to him being a rookie, it is very beneficial to keep him in the same system...

Davidson's playcalling kills me though.. scares me to death.. I'm 87% sure I could call a better game than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk, I think part of his problems at his previous jobs were a lot of the same ones we have with Fox. He was pretty conservative himself, although I think he gave a little more freedom to his OC in San Diego. He's an excellent defensive coach.

Ultimately though, I don't think it matters if we want him or not b/c I believe he said he doesn't want to coach again. IIRC he said that in a radio interview in the last year or so... May have been our "Fire Fox" campaign last year when Marty was suggested b/c he lives in Lake Norman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that would be the only reason...

and I would still be extremely concerned.. but yeah, I can't deny that Clausen is use to this type of system and due to him being a rookie, it is very beneficial to keep him in the same system...

Davidson's playcalling kills me though.. scares me to death.. I'm 87% sure I could call a better game than him.

Anyone that has played Madden could do that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...