Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bengals not giving Clausen much thought


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Per beat writer Paul Deener, interviewed on Frank and Buck.

The team reportedly feels comfortable going with 8 or 9 in the box and leaving corners Leon Hall and Jonathan Joseph on an island against Panther receivers. Clausen, he says, doesn't really scare them.

Naturally, we hope that proves to be a huge mistake. Objectively speaking though, is there any real reason for them to feel otherwise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the correct way to gameplan... you never want to let a team beat you with their best player/strength. They want to make clausen throw the ball, they realize were pretty one dimensional, and want to exploit that. Great running teams can run even when gameplanned against, our o line needs to step up. But at the same time you gotta take what they are giving you, that will be clausens job this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has to prove he can push the ball down field.

I have no doubt he can throw the short stuff but I want to see a deep ball.

I don't. I want to see a turnover free game. Clausen's deep stuff ain't his strength and those CBs in Cincy are nasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per beat writer Paul Deener, interviewed on Frank and Buck.

The team reportedly feels comfortable going with 8 or 9 in the box and leaving corners Leon Hall and Jonathan Joseph on an island against Panther receivers. Clausen, he says, doesn't really scare them.

Naturally, we hope that proves to be a huge mistake. Objectively speaking though, is there any real reason for them to feel otherwise?

This ties right into my first thread which didn't get a lot of love :confused: but it's cool I have to come harder next time. Panthers stomp bengals mark it down etc. they cant pay him to much attention with no ACTUAL TAPE on him we will win I repeat we will win this game because they cant take him serious untill he does something on the field to make them. Last year MM was in the same boat and the games were less meaningful but thats how football goes. If our qb doesnt stink it the f up we should win last week with four picks they still should have lost that game if you are lucky enough to have the ticket you would have seen 85 and 81 aren't really doing much gresham might make me break bottle or two but we will see soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...