Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

theory on Smitty


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

Smitty is fast

Smitty is elusive

Smitty makes himself available

Smitty should be thrown the ball even coverage is pretty good

Smitty makes the average passer/pass look great

Is Steve so dynamic and so proficient in his unique skill set that it is impossible to remain consistent as a passer with he and the other receivers simultaneously?

In other words, Is it mentally more difficult to run an offense with a huge gap in talent that we have always had here at #2 receiver?

Just wondering what your thoughts are.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A caller on Packman suggested today that perhaps the guys we've brought in over the years were very capable of being a great #2, especially the guys we have right now. But, he suggested that from watching the games that our routes and passing scheme is so simple that it's not conducive to those guys developing and playing up to their potential. He talked about how the Colts routes look totally different and it seems like it doesn't matter who they plug in at WR, there guys are gonna put up numbers.

That's not hard to imagine with who they have at QB, but you have to believe that the scheme itself has something to do with it.

With Smitty, I don't care if you told him to run a streak every play the whole game, if you throw it to him running that streak every play, he's gonna catch a lot of them and make plays after he does so. He's going to make plays other guys don't on a regular basis.

And I agree with Beaux, it should be easier for another guy to emerge with Smitty lining up on the other side. But, like i said, I think our passing system is a hindrance to developing any WR we've brought in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A caller on Packman suggested today that perhaps the guys we've brought in over the years were very capable of being a great #2, especially the guys we have right now. But, he suggested that from watching the games that our routes and passing scheme is so simple that it's not conducive to those guys developing and playing up to their potential. He talked about how the Colts routes look totally different and it seems like it doesn't matter who they plug in at WR, there guys are gonna put up numbers.

That's not hard to imagine with who they have at QB, but you have to believe that the scheme itself has something to do with it.

With Smitty, I don't care if you told him to run a streak every play the whole game, if you throw it to him running that streak every play, he's gonna catch a lot of them and make plays after he does so. He's going to make plays other guys don't on a regular basis.

And I agree with Beaux, it should be easier for another guy to emerge with Smitty lining up on the other side. But, like i said, I think our passing system is a hindrance to developing any WR we've brought in.

That would explain why so many of our failures at the #2 WR spot have gone on to enormous success after we let go of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calling out the coaches on this one...

its the scheme. Henning's passing schemes were much, MUCH better than Davidson's. It's like Henning was an actual coach, and to Davidson, passing the ball is just a hobby he sometimes takes up. Either that or a hated chore that he resents having to do at all.

He cares about as much about passing as I do about hearing about my wife's job! I'm there when she's talking...but I'm not really paying attention...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not buying it. Smith's dominance should make it that much easier for another receiver to step up as a clear No. 2.

I don't think you can look at any No. 1 receiver in the league and say that they are so talented that they made it difficult for the quarterback to consistently hit the other receivers.

i agree. a dominant 1 frees the other guys. i was more along the lines of timing does the qb feel less comfortable with 2 and 3 after getting up to speed with 1? What recognition an adjustment must take place when going through progressions after a snap to accommodate the pluses and minuses for each target?

of course this is a question for any team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...