Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Its a copy cat league


Snake

Recommended Posts

So now its time to take a page out of SFs book. What I saw from them is something the panthers really need to adopt. Running 3 Wide 1TE with a single back set. That would force the D to respect Smith, Gettis,LaFell, and Rosario while allowing Dwill and JStew to run out of the backfield and run screens.

I was really Impressed on how the 49ers used it and how similar our two teams are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now its time to take a page out of SFs book. What I saw from them is something the panthers really need to adopt. Running 3 Wide 1TE with a single back set. That would force the D to respect Smith, Gettis,LaFell, and Rosario while allowing Dwill and JStew to run out of the backfield and run screens.

I was really Impressed on how the 49ers used it and how similar our two teams are.

Yeah, it was kinda weird to see how similar the two teams are. Only big difference is that they seem to understand how to utilize a passing-TE. But then again, we beat em :bigear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now its time to take a page out of SFs book. What I saw from them is something the panthers really need to adopt. Running 3 Wide 1TE with a single back set. That would force the D to respect Smith, Gettis,LaFell, and Rosario while allowing Dwill and JStew to run out of the backfield and run screens.

I was really Impressed on how the 49ers used it and how similar our two teams are.

this would make sense, but copying a 1-5 team that we just beat is a bad thing, imo.

still, we do need to be moving towards that a whole lot more. the league is moving away from the FB and it's time we started doing that as well. nothing against the idea of using a FB...it's just not working as well as using multiple receivers to draw defenders away from the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it was kinda weird to see how similar the two teams are. Only big difference is that they seem to understand how to utilize a passing-TE. But then again, we beat em :bigear:
rosario was the 3rd most productive receiver ahead of smith yesterday.

i think we've found our passing TE.

you know how many targets jeff king and gary banidge got? nada. rosario had 5 and caught all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rosario was the 3rd most productive receiver ahead of smith yesterday.

i think we've found our passing TE.

you know how many targets jeff king and gary banidge got? nada. rosario had 5 and caught all of them.

Your right and all, Rosario did have a solid game, but I was talking more on a more consistent level. I would love to see him get 4-6 receptions a game or more depending on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used to run out of 3 WR sets b/c it spaces the field and makes the defense second guess on passes. If I'm not mistaken, that's how DLo first busted out was through using passing formations b/c people on here argued how he should be starting over Foster b/c his YPC was so good.

As I've been screaming the last few days, I don't know what's the point of continuously running the power and off-tackle plays out of the offset I-form or the 1 WR sets. We keep doing it with no success. I think that was our most successful formation when DWill and Stewart really became the backs we know them to be, but the OL was much more capable of running those plays than this group.

I think we should go back to the 3 WR sets to have more success until the OL is capable of blowing the DL back like we did before. But, if the coaching staff hasn't made such a 'drastic' adjustment yet, I'm not holding my breath for them to do so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used to run out of 3 WR sets b/c it spaces the field and makes the defense second guess on passes. If I'm not mistaken, that's how DLo first busted out was through using passing formations b/c people on here argued how he should be starting over Foster b/c his YPC was so good.

As I've been screaming the last few days, I don't know what's the point of continuously running the power and off-tackle plays out of the offset I-form or the 1 WR sets. We keep doing it with no success. I think that was our most successful formation when DWill and Stewart really became the backs we know them to be, but the OL was much more capable of running those plays than this group.

I think we should go back to the 3 WR sets to have more success until the OL is capable of blowing the DL back like we did before. But, if the coaching staff hasn't made such a 'drastic' adjustment yet, I'm not holding my breath for them to do so...

Yea I agree. We are trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. IMO we were lucky to come out with a win yesterday. Every time we ran we were stuffed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I also keep saying with the OLs inability to hold up on these delayed-style running plays and counters that we need to abandon that altogether, regardless of the formation, and we need to run quick hitting runs - dives, isos, etc. and mix in draws out of passing formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I also keep saying with the OLs inability to hold up on these delayed-style running plays and counters that we need to abandon that altogether, regardless of the formation, and we need to run quick hitting runs - dives, isos, etc. and mix in draws out of passing formations.

Basically what the Lions did with Berry Sanders in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...