Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Its a copy cat league


Snake

Recommended Posts

So now its time to take a page out of SFs book. What I saw from them is something the panthers really need to adopt. Running 3 Wide 1TE with a single back set. That would force the D to respect Smith, Gettis,LaFell, and Rosario while allowing Dwill and JStew to run out of the backfield and run screens.

I was really Impressed on how the 49ers used it and how similar our two teams are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now its time to take a page out of SFs book. What I saw from them is something the panthers really need to adopt. Running 3 Wide 1TE with a single back set. That would force the D to respect Smith, Gettis,LaFell, and Rosario while allowing Dwill and JStew to run out of the backfield and run screens.

I was really Impressed on how the 49ers used it and how similar our two teams are.

Yeah, it was kinda weird to see how similar the two teams are. Only big difference is that they seem to understand how to utilize a passing-TE. But then again, we beat em :bigear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now its time to take a page out of SFs book. What I saw from them is something the panthers really need to adopt. Running 3 Wide 1TE with a single back set. That would force the D to respect Smith, Gettis,LaFell, and Rosario while allowing Dwill and JStew to run out of the backfield and run screens.

I was really Impressed on how the 49ers used it and how similar our two teams are.

this would make sense, but copying a 1-5 team that we just beat is a bad thing, imo.

still, we do need to be moving towards that a whole lot more. the league is moving away from the FB and it's time we started doing that as well. nothing against the idea of using a FB...it's just not working as well as using multiple receivers to draw defenders away from the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it was kinda weird to see how similar the two teams are. Only big difference is that they seem to understand how to utilize a passing-TE. But then again, we beat em :bigear:
rosario was the 3rd most productive receiver ahead of smith yesterday.

i think we've found our passing TE.

you know how many targets jeff king and gary banidge got? nada. rosario had 5 and caught all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rosario was the 3rd most productive receiver ahead of smith yesterday.

i think we've found our passing TE.

you know how many targets jeff king and gary banidge got? nada. rosario had 5 and caught all of them.

Your right and all, Rosario did have a solid game, but I was talking more on a more consistent level. I would love to see him get 4-6 receptions a game or more depending on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used to run out of 3 WR sets b/c it spaces the field and makes the defense second guess on passes. If I'm not mistaken, that's how DLo first busted out was through using passing formations b/c people on here argued how he should be starting over Foster b/c his YPC was so good.

As I've been screaming the last few days, I don't know what's the point of continuously running the power and off-tackle plays out of the offset I-form or the 1 WR sets. We keep doing it with no success. I think that was our most successful formation when DWill and Stewart really became the backs we know them to be, but the OL was much more capable of running those plays than this group.

I think we should go back to the 3 WR sets to have more success until the OL is capable of blowing the DL back like we did before. But, if the coaching staff hasn't made such a 'drastic' adjustment yet, I'm not holding my breath for them to do so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used to run out of 3 WR sets b/c it spaces the field and makes the defense second guess on passes. If I'm not mistaken, that's how DLo first busted out was through using passing formations b/c people on here argued how he should be starting over Foster b/c his YPC was so good.

As I've been screaming the last few days, I don't know what's the point of continuously running the power and off-tackle plays out of the offset I-form or the 1 WR sets. We keep doing it with no success. I think that was our most successful formation when DWill and Stewart really became the backs we know them to be, but the OL was much more capable of running those plays than this group.

I think we should go back to the 3 WR sets to have more success until the OL is capable of blowing the DL back like we did before. But, if the coaching staff hasn't made such a 'drastic' adjustment yet, I'm not holding my breath for them to do so...

Yea I agree. We are trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. IMO we were lucky to come out with a win yesterday. Every time we ran we were stuffed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I also keep saying with the OLs inability to hold up on these delayed-style running plays and counters that we need to abandon that altogether, regardless of the formation, and we need to run quick hitting runs - dives, isos, etc. and mix in draws out of passing formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I also keep saying with the OLs inability to hold up on these delayed-style running plays and counters that we need to abandon that altogether, regardless of the formation, and we need to run quick hitting runs - dives, isos, etc. and mix in draws out of passing formations.

Basically what the Lions did with Berry Sanders in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have never seen this cat play a single snap of football, BUT, I really hope that we're not counting on a 25 yo, UDFA who played 6 years of college ball to suddenly replace our starting LB.  Sounds to me like Dean Jones needed a story and didn't have anything else to write about. Wishing the guy luck though, cool nickname.
    • I'll go 1 further than that. This 23 year old had spent 4 years as a middle of the pack college player before exploding onto the scene as a 5th year senior, then we have enough faith in him to trade up 1 spot so that we can get a 5th year option and guarantee his salary. So in about a year's time he went from a mid round pick to a first rounder. It would be hard NOT to let that go to your head! I'm going to trust that the staff know what they're doing with XL and not give him too much crap about being a dumbass LAST season, as long as he doesn't continue to be one.
    • From Brugler's scouting report... Tavareon “Bam” Martin-Scott picked up his nickname because of the fireworks celebration he typically receives to celebrate his birthday. He grew up playing pee wee football in Fort Wayne, Ind., but developed late and was mostly a part-time player until his senior year at Snider High (alma mater of Jessie Bates). He posted 87 tackles and 6.0 sacks as a senior in 2018, but it wasn’t enough to put him on the recruiting radar. A no-star recruit, he played two seasons with Dodge City (Kan.) Community College and then received several SEC offers. His playing time and production gradually increased each season for the Gamecocks, and he put intriguing flashes on film. Martin-Scott is a good-sized athlete, with pursuit speed to match races to the perimeter. He competes with a banger mentality to pinball off blocks and stay determined on his path to the ball. Overall, Martin-Scott freelances a tad too much with inconsistent steps in coverage, but he is a classic run-and-hit linebacker who likes to play loose and chase plays — necessary ingredients for NFL special teams. grade: Free Agent
×
×
  • Create New...