Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nick Hayden


Woodcookedbbq

Recommended Posts

Not a Nick Hayden fan at all. Just about every time I've seen him make a tackle it's 2 to 5yds down field. That's not good for a DT! He's one of the strongest players on the team, but yet he get's pushed off the ball with ease. Now Derek Landri is the truth! He makes me feel better about us letting Jovan Haye get away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayden has been steadily improving since he got here, but most fans choose to ignore that because he sucked in his first start against NYG in '08. Just like people refuse to acknowledge Godfrey's improvement, once Panthers fans get it in their head that someone on the team isn't good, they rarely change their opinion regardless of what actually happens on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayden has been steadily improving since he got here, but most fans choose to ignore that because he sucked in his first start against NYG in '08. Just like people refuse to acknowledge Godfrey's improvement, once Panthers fans get it in their head that someone on the team isn't good, they rarely change their opinion regardless of what actually happens on the field.

I'll gladly acknowledge Godfrey's great play this year. A "steady imporvement" from crap has only got Nick to the level of average. Get back to me when he starts on a regular basis because he has earned that right. Sort of like Martin did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

Wow...he's made a play or two. Guess what? He's supposed to.

He is not worth the. spot he takes up.

So who did the panthers cut that makes you think damn we should have kept him instead of hayden? With our defense you need to have rotational guys on the line which is perfect for him. Who on our line starts anyways every single down except maybe brayton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a lot easier to make snarky turnstyle and rollerskate comments that get pie than to admit he's improved a lot since his rookie year.

I'm pretty sure to stay in this league one must show continuous improvement, but that's not the issue. The fact remains the DT position- all of the players who are at that position- are the weakest aspect of this defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has made some plays. But our run defense has not done very well the last couple of games, and a good portion of that falls on the defensive tackles. All of them, not just one.

I think thats the problem with going small with DTs. The Colts were the same way with Meeks. There DTs were not much of run stoppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...