Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No --- jim haslett


FrostyOne

Recommended Posts

Haslett, who has been a defensive coordinator or head coach for the past 13 seasons, is believed to be interested in joining Fox's staff. Haslett attended Senior Bowl practices this week and was exploring potential job opportunities.

Well, well. I brought Haslett up yesterday. And was told Fox and Haslett don't get along. But it looks like Haslett wants to join the Team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Haslett = Turdovac 2.0...why does Fox hire the same guy sweet lord if he hires Haslett it will just be proof that Fox is the problem and this organization needs to find a new leader.

I'm beginning to think anything Fox does, will be in your eyes, the proof that Fox is the problem.

Seems pretty retarded to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a better DC than he is HC.

Not really. His defenses with the Rams were terrible, and Linehan spent all 3 of his first round picks there on defensive players, and picked up Witherspoon and Draft, and maybe a few others I can't think of off the top of my head.

Before that he was a DC with the Steelers, and he did okay, but never top 5 okay, but that was 10 years, 2 different jobs in different cities, and a different base defense ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/story/490610.html

Please, for goodness sake, NO Jim Haslett

I would like to see someone @ DC that Fox does not know

I find it hard to believe that will happen. Fox is one of the best defensive minds out there. I'm pretty sure he knows what he's looking for, and that would be someone to run his scheme.

If only we had a front 4 that would create pressure, you all would be madly in love with him. I believe he's done hte best he's had available to him. Let's see what he does to help that out.

There are other factors other than "Get that guy, get this guy. Good, done".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very True--and I am a former HS English teacher.  
    • Not a Moore fan-but he had a few good games last year-but I want players that scare you--Renfrow's route running and intelligence, Legette's size, speed, and strength, AT's intelligence and route running, Coker's body control, strong hands, and abilty to win contested catches, and TMac's size, body control, and ability to find soft spots in zone coverages.  Horn gives them the ability to stretch the field and he plays special teams.   Moore has a nice smile and can dance.  He filled in well last season, but to get better as a team, you have to upgrade your players.  I think Moore is a bottom of the roster guy who got bumped when we drafted 2 WRs and signed a legit free agent.  Here is the thing--TMac makes us better because he is great against the zone--man?  Good luck with that.  AT's role can be reduced, and that is probably a good thing.  He can specialize in situational football. Coker?  Just getting started. XL?  Just getting started.  Drafting TMac was probably a bit of a wake up call, but XL will be better as the 2. Renfrow?  I see him splitting reps with AT--keeping both fresh and giving different looks. Horn?  Watch the safety cheat his side when he is in the game--I see a young Steve Smith type in him, but he has yet to play a game.  I hear that Morgan loves him.
    • Burns at 5-6 seems....a little aggressive.
×
×
  • Create New...