Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Oh, I'm not giving up on him, and I hope he grows and grows into a great TE, but he is far from dominant on the field right now. Pair him up with another young, but dominant TE and it opens a world of opportunities for our offense, both in the passing and rushing game. We would move more into the dictating our game to the other team than having their defense ram what they wanted to down our throats.

We need hitters on offense. We need multi-role guys on the field. And we need some punch in the now before Thielen finally gets caught by Father Time. 

 

thats not our offense though, that certainly isnt Canalas offense at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

thats not our offense though, that certainly isnt Canalas offense at all

Basically Sanders would become the third TE if we picked Warren because Canales wants a blocking TE as his TE2.  Warren would get like 50 targets and Sanders like 10

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Sorry, but his junior year is what most TEs dream of in college.  His Freshman year Pat Freiermuth was there, he wasn't seeing the field.  So his only "non-productive" year was his Soph. year when he was still behind Brenton Strange who was drafted in round 2 in the 2023 draft.

Warren is legit.  I'll take a Swiss Army knife offensive player over a 8-10 sack per season EDGE guy every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

 

8 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

45Catfan pretty much answered this. But... on the junior season, I'd happily take a guy who managed 7 touchdowns in 34 passes. Plus blocked. And then as a senior they roll him out not just as a receiver and a blocker, but as a running back and wildcat QB. 

He is the prototypical football guy a team needs. 

He was a 3 star guy recuit

In 2022 he was 3rd string.

2023 he had a 15% drop rate 

2024 he was the whole offense and super stud


Both of youz guyz have made up minds, his whole resume is one peak at the end. He wasn't talked about in drafts until this year, even then during January on many mocks he was listed among 3rd rounds.

 IMG_9126.thumb.jpeg.6677fcb2a523dada9fbd43260feb3cbd.jpeg.6c4a10365398756fbc2ca65db33867db.jpeg

 

Then the rocket happens...

This is one weird flawed draft, Im just pointing out warrens history and facts. along with piss poor TE draft history and his 5th year leap after being a forgotten member. Sorry he's your fav...

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and Bryce has never shown that he likes to throw to the tight ends

Which is crazy because they are like a security blanket for QBs.  To be fair throwing to Ian Thomas is not very inspiring or reliable.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jfra78 said:

Sanders caught everything thrown at him and was open alot without Bryce even looking his way.  Why you guys want to give up on Sanders makes little sense to me as well

Not giving up on him, he's just a TE2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

 

He was a 3 star guy recuit

In 2022 he was 3rd string.

2023 he had a 15% drop rate 

2024 he was the whole offense and super stud


Both of youz guyz have made up minds, his whole resume is one peak at the end. He wasn't talked about in drafts until this year, even then during January on many mocks he was listed among 3rd rounds.

 IMG_9126.thumb.jpeg.6677fcb2a523dada9fbd43260feb3cbd.jpeg.6c4a10365398756fbc2ca65db33867db.jpeg

 

Then the rocket happens...

This is one weird flawed draft, Im just pointing out warrens history and facts. along with piss poor TE draft history and his 5th year leap after being a forgotten member. Sorry he's your fav...

 

 

 

 

 

I realize we are going for a mediocre EDGE player, but I don't have to like it. I mean it's par for the course, I'm routinely disappointed in our drafts year after year.  It would be different if I thought our drafts sucked and we were winning Super Bowls, or crap, even sniffing the playoffs.   I think I have room to gripe when I think our drafts sucks and our team actually does suck.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, 45catfan said:

I realize we are going for a mediocre EDGE player, but I don't have to like it. I mean it's par for the course, I'm routinely disappointed in our drafts year after year.  It would be different if I thought our drafts sucked and we were winning Super Bowls, or crap, even sniffing the playoffs.   I think I have room to gripe when I think our drafts sucks and our team actually does suck.

the last six years of suck have hurt me too, friend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/15/2025 at 8:15 PM, 45catfan said:

Which is crazy because they are like a security blanket for QBs.  To be fair throwing to Ian Thomas is not very inspiring or reliable.

Ian Thomas was only 7 receiving yards ahead of me last season. He bested me by 56 yards in 2023 so IMO I am closing the gap rapidly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

it aint happening brother

I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping the Jets draft Warren over an OT, that way he won't be on the board WHEN (not if) we bypass him for a less polished player.  BPA my arse.  I know, I know, he might not be that high on our board, even though roughly 95% of all Big Boards I've seen has him at least a top 8 talent.  VERY seldomly to I see him ranked lower than that.  Granted he's slated to get drafted lower than that value simply because TE is a niche positional need.  Again, Sanders is not a TE1, he's a TE2.  I mean, we tried to make Ian Thomas a TE1 for how long?  Thomas was at best a TE3, but we kept trying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...