Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Didn't notice until now...


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

LB is the last thing I'm worried about at the moment, but the fact that there is decent talent available doesn't mean we can't take a look at someone though either.

It sucks that this isn't a banner year for DEs. Even the draft which you can usually count on to be deep with DEs is weaker than normal. Top prospect Orakpo even has been discussed to have some real question marks, playwise. And free agency, well it doesn't front too many appealing options either. (from our perspective. In the eyes of everyone else though, they are looking at Peppers with a gleam in their eye)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there enough good ones to make the switch to a 3-4?

:ack2:

in lieu of making another thread, i made a special write up on the possibility of moving to a 3-4 in my blog. Iz funny too.

but I did come up with some good points.

Actually Willie McGinest, Brian Scott, Ray Lewis, Eric Barton, Channing Crowder, and Terrell Suggs have all had 3-4 experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think linebackers are what's keeping us from making the switch. I think Conner will be a solid LB, pair him up with Beason on the inside, keep davis and diggs on the outside and I think that would be fine. Our D-Line, and the fact that fox is still the coach, would be the major hindrances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F*ck 4-3 AND 3-4. With the amount of LBs on our roster and headed for FA, we could just run a 7. In addition to utilizing the talent we have on our roster, we wouldn't have to worry about hiring a D-Line coach.

I like your Idea. Who the hell needs DEs anyway. Screw em let just use LBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...