Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton????????


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I'm hearing alot of chants for Luck,Mallet,and Locker.

I havent heard One person mention the name of Cam Newton.

It seems to me he has the most upside of any player in the draft and maybe the strongest arm. Not to say Luck isn't great but I havent been hearing good things about his deep ball.

I just dont want to end up with clausen 2.0 with a arm like chad pennington.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hearing alot of chants for Luck,Mallet,and Locker.

I havent heard One person mention the name of Cam Newton.

It seems to me he has the most upside of any player in the draft and maybe the strongest arm. Not to say Luck isn't great but I havent been hearing good things about his deep ball.

I just dont want to end up with clausen 2.0 with a arm like chad pennington.

I suggest you actually watch the games before you post. :idea:

And the rest of us don't want a qb with a brain as small as yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hearing alot of chants for Luck,Mallet,and Locker.

I havent heard One person mention the name of Cam Newton.

It seems to me he has the most upside of any player in the draft and maybe the strongest arm. Not to say Luck isn't great but I havent been hearing good things about his deep ball.

I just dont want to end up with clausen 2.0 with a arm like chad pennington.

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Right as opposed to a QB who plays in an offense taylor made to make him look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Mark Sanchez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Aaron Rodgers.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

you can say that about SEC qbs as well. chris leak, The Golden Calf of Bristol, jamarcus russel, matt flynn, perriloux, jason cambell....the list goes on.

Luck runs a pro style offense, with a head coach who played nfl quarterback succesfully, and has all the makings of a very good qb. he has the physical tools, hes from stanford, hes smart etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.
not all underclassmen, but the PAC10 is kind of underrated when it comes to QBs coming out. currently they have these guys starting: sanchez, palmer (had a good run i'd say before injuries), aaron rodgers, matt cassel.

right now the Pac10 has more QBs starting for them than other conferences except for maybe the ACC.

SEC has the manning boys, cutler, and stafford. for such a tough conference, you would think they would have more QBs starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest you actually watch the games before you post. :idea:

And the rest of us don't want a qb with a brain as small as yours.

You might wanna check more game film before u flame...the only questions about luck are his arm strength.

When anyone asks about lucks arm strength the answer that come up is always meh...or its ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...