Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Sabres 7pm


 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

Canes playing hard, just not getting it done.Anyone saying they’re laying back isn’t watching the game I am. Just turnovers and goalie play beating us.

Not at all my man. The only reason they look like they are playing hard is the copious amounts of shots from the perimeter.  We aren’t playing hard. Slavin burns hall getting lazy shows there was a directive not to get hurt.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Not at all my man. The only reason they look like they are playing hard is the copious amounts of shots from the perimeter.  We aren’t playing hard. Slavin burns hall getting lazy shows there was a directive not to get hurt.  

We played hard. 33-18 SOG.

Edited by DavidEng
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Look at the stats. Most shots from the perimeter.  No real effort to drive to middle or breakaway. 

What is it about holding a team to only 18 SOG is playing soft? Shot selection has to do with playing smart, not how hard you play.

 Canes had turnovers and and Kootchie didn’t play well. Reimer was outstanding. That was the difference. But you do you.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

What is it about holding a team to only 18 SOG is playing soft? Shot selection has to do with playing smart, not how hard you play.

 Canes had turnovers and and Kootchie didn’t play well. Reimer was outstanding. That was the difference. But you do you.

No no man. That part is fine. It’s our shots on goal.  We didn’t challenge to score. I would say we had 1 grade A.  We played our game but played  it half ass.  Sure koochie wasn’t good. But the team looked and played miles different vs last Wednesday and beyond lately.   Y’all would agree this team didn’t play hard based on the eye test. They played at 60%. That Fast injury is real. 
 

the boys know they have it locked it up.  We all want them to win but health is what’s important.  Look at every top team that isn’t playing for much. They have all mail it. All of them. It’s one of those years. 

Edited by Panthers Fan 69
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...