Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fixing the front 5


MHS831

Recommended Posts

What a difference a year makes. Major decisions will be necessary to repair the oline in the offseason. What happens here will determine success in 2011 more than a QB change.

LT- Gross will be 31 and is probably just passing his prime. Quality depth is needed. Wharton sliding out is not the answer. Never was.

LG- Wharton has been pretty solid, but Bernadeau is a failed experiment. I see him looking back at the QB, RB before most plays are over.

C- Kalil could walk. We will not tag him because we have to pay LT money. Not much is being said about him, but this is huge. We have no decent backup center. We need to look at the position in the draft and perhaps free agency.

RG- Where have you gone, Duke Robinson, Panther nation turns its lonely eyes to you. Schwartz is decent depth, but we need a stud RG.

RT- Is Otah going to continue his string of injuries dating back to Pitt? \

OK GMs. Fix this mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can resign Kalil, the O-line should be fine next year. The only hole will be at right guard and with Bernadeau and Schwartz both getting reps this year plus finding someone in FA to fill in like we did with Vincent in 2009, we should get fine. One of the few pluses of having injuries at a position is that the backup gains experience. We had little depth on the O-line this year but many of those guys are a year further in their development.

And of course getting a mobile quarterback like Newton would instantly make this O-line 100% better in spite of any changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can resign Kalil, the O-line should be fine next year. The only hole will be at right guard and with Bernadeau and Schwartz both getting reps this year plus finding someone in FA to fill in like we did with Vincent in 2009, we should get fine. One of the few pluses of having injuries at a position is that the backup gains experience. We had little depth on the O-line this year but many of those guys are a year further in their development.

And of course getting a mobile quarterback like Newton would instantly make this O-line 100% better in spite of any changes.

Do you want Newton over luck?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you want Newton over luck?

It reminds of what the debate would be if Payton Manning and Ben Roethlisberger had come out in the same draft. They are very different guys. We should have a coach by them and based on what he wants to run we should pick accordingly.

At first look Luck would appear to be the top choice but if we continue to run as much or more than we pass, Newton could be a better fit. Plus i want to hear what folks say about their work ethic, football knowledge, and other features. Because Newton was a transfer and Luck is a redshirt sophomore neither really showed up on the radar screen until this year.

If Luck stays in school, newton becomes the prohibitive favorite for the top pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton definitely has our attention. THe best thing about Newton--we could trade down, grab a second rounder this season and a first rounder in 2012, and still get him or Mallet. The bidding for Luck would be high. With the second rounder we could get a good DT and use the third round for CB--or vica versa.

Newton is an interesting thought, but he is a risky pick. If Clausen finishes strong, and can serve as a safety net, I might do it. If Clausen continues to struggle, I say we should take Luck. The next coach may not focus on the run as much, as Luck is the most NFL ready (deja vu). I still think both are hype. I see Vince Young in him. Not fair I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It reminds of what the debate would be if Payton Manning and Ben Roethlisberger had come out in the same draft. They are very different guys. We should have a coach by them and based on what he wants to run we should pick accordingly.

At first look Luck would appear to be the top choice but if we continue to run as much or more than we pass, Newton could be a better fit. Plus i want to hear what folks say about their work ethic, football knowledge, and other features. Because Newton was a transfer and Luck is a redshirt sophomore neither really showed up on the radar screen until this year.

If Luck stays in school, newton becomes the prohibitive favorite for the top pick.

Newton seems like such a project to me..lots of potential there but IDK if he can start in his first year..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just SO fuging excited about these QB's in the draft that all of you keep hyping.

I mean, we are going to be so good next year because the success rate of 1 and 2 year college starters that jump to the NFL is SO fuging high.

If nothing else the next QB for the Panthers should give Claussen and Moore about a million dollars each. The same way Bradford should give Fitzpatrick and whoever else started for the Rams last year a fat present.

"We've won 6 games with this guy, he is the real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a difference a year makes. Major decisions will be necessary to repair the oline in the offseason. What happens here will determine success in 2011 more than a QB change.

LT- Gross will be 31 and is probably just passing his prime. Quality depth is needed. Wharton sliding out is not the answer. Never was.

LG- Wharton has been pretty solid, but Bernadeau is a failed experiment. I see him looking back at the QB, RB before most plays are over.

C- Kalil could walk. We will not tag him because we have to pay LT money. Not much is being said about him, but this is huge. We have no decent backup center. We need to look at the position in the draft and perhaps free agency.

RG- Where have you gone, Duke Robinson, Panther nation turns its lonely eyes to you. Schwartz is decent depth, but we need a stud RG.

RT- Is Otah going to continue his string of injuries dating back to Pitt? \

OK GMs. Fix this mess.

It all depends on the offensive philosophy of the new HC.

Kalil is a talented C (though he's having an off year), and fits into most systems.

Gross isn't as good as he used to be, BUT he has a monster contract, so he isn't going anywhere. I would be tempted to move him back to RT if the opportunity arises though, 'cos he's not an elite LT.

Otah. Who knows? All the talent in the world, but he can't stay on the field. Obviously he's a monster run blocker, but his pass blocking is merely adequate (though much, MUCH better than the guys we've subbed in for him). If we go to a pass happy offence we might look to shift him.

Wharton is still a good G, but again he's had a bit of a down year. Still, he's worth retaining regardless of the system.

Schwartz and Bernadeau are trash.

How would I fix it? Tough to do with the draft picks we have. I don't think there are any studly OTs coming out this year (though I've not analysed the draft in depth yet) and few Gs are worth first round picks. Free Agency seems to be the way to go, which is never advisable as you always end up overpaying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...