Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strength of Schedule Breakdown


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So for my own information (and because I'm a nerdy insomniac) I decided to do my own workup on the strength of schedule numbers.

I now have a headache :(

Mind you, these numbers are irrelevant right now because the Bengals have one more win than us, but they become very relevant if our records match. That's why it's worth taking a look at the ramifications of the games to come.

Honestly, I still feel I need clarification on one thing, that being whether divisional rivals actually count twice. In the numbers from both Gantt and the Great Blue North Report draft site, they do. However, the NFL's official tie-breaking procedures as listed online don't actually say. So the question becomes this: Do they only count a division team once - since in reality they are only one opponent - or twice because we play them twice? My guess would be the latter, but if it's listed officially anywhere, I haven't seen it.

Running with that assumption for now, here are the things you need to know if you want the Panthers to have the #1 pick:

Let's start with the current numbers.

- Panthers: .591

- Bengals: .587

(Side Note: take the divisional factor out and we get a decent edge on the Bengals - .556 to .580 - but I'm not counting it that way for the moment; if I learn otherwise, I'll revise this)

Thanks to the NFL's decision to schedule lots of division games late in the season, there are a fair number of games remaining for which the result is a wash for us. For example, the Bills entire remaining schedule consists of divisional games, and all against other teams that have also played the Bengals since the AFC North and AFC east matched up against each other this season. Thus, one wins, one loses, the math balances out and the result changes nothing. Ditto the Seahawks for us. Well, almost. Everybody they play has also played us so it's mostly a wash, except the divisional factor makes it to our advantage for them to beat the Bucs in week sixteen. On the other side, same deal for Pittsburgh and also Cleveland (outside of the Bengals game, of course; more about that later).

Throw in the fact that our respective divisions - AFC North and NFC South - also played each other this year. Therefore, the Bengals played all of our divisional rivals (and us) and by season's end we will have played all of theirs (and them). That means that while a win by one of our divisional foes hurts us, it also hurts them, just not quite as much since it counts double for us, and vice versa.

(got all that?) :sosp:

Overall, it's better for our divisional opponents to lose - except when Atlanta plays us - and for theirs to win (except Cleveland against them, but again more on that later). Take next week's Jets-Steelers contest, let's say. It would be a wash for Cincinnati since both teams have played the Bengals. However, since the Steelers are a divisional opponent, their winning hurts the Bengals worse. For us, there's the Atlanta-Seattle matchup. The overall result would be a wash but for the divisional factor. However, on a more practical level, it's best for us if the Seahawks win because it makes the division race closer and lessens the likelihood of Atlanta sitting starters in week seventeen (wouldn't put money on that one though).

Think it's complicated so far?

Trust me, you ain't seen nothin' yet :eek:

They say English is one of the most difficult languages to learn because there are loads of exceptions to the rules. Likewise, there are a few oddities in the late season math. One is next week's Ravens-Saints game. A Ravens win gives the Bengals a double increase and us a double decrease. Unfortunately, it also gives Atlanta breathing room, provided they don't fall to the Seahawks. Thus, the Ravens winning is really only beneficial if either the Seahawks also beat the Falcons (unlikely) or we lose to Arizona, or (obviously) both. The week sixteen divisional matchup against the Saints is the better chance for Atlanta to lose, and beneficial to us, even if you have to hold your nose to cheer for either team.

But here's where it gets really weird :skep:

Let's say we beat Arizona and the Bengals lose to the Browns. We're screwed right?

Well, not entirely, because we played the Bengals.

The Bengals losing to the Browns increases their strength of schedule twofold because of the divisional factor (which also makes that game a wash for us). Likewise, our winning increases their number because they played us, and it weakens ours by putting a loss in Arizona's column. Thus, independent of other results, here's what happens to the current numbers should we beat Arizona and the Bengals lose to the Browns.

- Panthers: SoS goes down three hundredths from .591 to .588

- Bengals: SoS goes up five hundredths from .587 to .592

In this scenario, while our records would match, we'd win the tiebreaker. Now, naturally it's better for it not to come to that because of the possibility of the Falcons resting their starters against us in week seventeen. Regardless, it's probably enough to make your head spin already :willy_nilly:

So to make it simple, here's a list of rooting interests (outside the obvious) for the last three weeks of the season.

WEEK 15:

Chargers over 49ers

Colts over Jaguars

Eagles over Giants

Lions over Bucs

Patriots over Packers

Chiefs over Rams

Ravens over Saints (conditionally, see above)

Seahawks over Falcons

Vikings over Bears

WEEK 16:

Colts over Raiders

Cowboys over Cardinals

Dolphins over Lions

Jets over Bears

Packers over Giants

Saints over Falcons

Seahawks over Bucs

WEEK 17:

Chargers over Broncos

Colts over Titans

Packers over Bears

Redskins over Giants

Looking down the list, our best friends are the Colts. Our worst enemies? The Bears and Giants.

Weird quirk: Jets-Steelers in week 15 narrows the gap no matter what the result. The best case scenario is the Jets winning as it narrows the schedule only by a single hundredth.

So there's the basics. Again, it's still overall better to not have to worry about the math, but if it becomes a factor this should help you know where we stand.

Oh, one last thing...

Did I mention that if we should somehow happen to win two of our remaining games and the Bills, Lions or Broncos lose out, we'd also be in a position of having to match strength of schedule with them for a shot at the number two spot? Depending on those results, we could actually fall as far down the list as pick number five :banghead:

Yeah...I'm going to bed :svengo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"That day Mr. Scot did math and compared schedules like a warrior poet."

I still think it's rubbish that the heads up game doesn't count for much, besides the slight S.O.S. increase, in the draft. It's the first tie breaker in determining the playoff standings. Why is it kicked to the curb for the draft. Mr. Scot could have gotten five more hours of sleep for God's sake. I want answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-----

They say English is one of the most difficult languages to learn because there are loads of exceptions to the rules. Likewise, there are a few oddities in the late season math. One is next week's Ravens-Saints game. A Ravens win gives the Bengals a double increase and us a double decrease. Unfortunately, it also gives Atlanta breathing room, provided they don't fall to the Seahawks. Thus, the Ravens winning is really only beneficial if either the Seahawks also beat the Falcons (unlikely) or we lose to Arizona, or (obviously) both. The week sixteen divisional matchup against the Saints is the better chance for Atlanta to lose, and beneficial to us, even if you have to hold your nose to cheer for either team.------

I'm a huge nerd also and this is the only thing I noticed that was incorrect or misleading. The Ravens saints game has no effect in giving the Falcons breathing room in terms of resting starters week 17... the only game that matters is the falcons saints game...

Currently the saints have 1 loss in the division (to the falcons) and are 10-3, The falcons have no loss in the division and it (11-2). Even if the the saints lose next week it will come down to their week 16 matchup.

If the saints lose to the ravens but beats the falcons and the falcons also beats the seahawks the saints will be 11-4 going into the last week and the falcons would be 12-3. They would both have 1 loss in the division and be playing a division opponent. Which means the falcons will have a lot to play for week 17!!! Because if they lose to us, and the saints beat the falcons the saints will then own the divisional tie breaker and win the division at 12-4.

And if Atlanta Beats the saints week 15 they clinch the division no matter what happens in their other remaining games.

So the meaning of all this.... If you want to cheer for our best chances of getting the #1 pick.... Hope the saints beat the Falcons!!!!!

So going back to SOS tiebreakers the saints losing to the Ravens is more beneficial to us, with no downside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...