Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we get Luck, Bring Jake back..


Fade2BlackAndBlue

Recommended Posts

Absolutely. We'll be able to sign him for cheap. I'm sure he'd like nothing more than to come back to Carolina. A lot of the guys in the locker room would love to have him back. There'd be absolutely no question in anyone's mind about whether or not he should start (obviously not). He's a high character guy who I'm sure would thrive in the role of a veteran mentor. He could handle stepping in as a back-up if we needed him to, and he should retire a Panther. Bring the Ragin' Cajun back home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to bring a veteran in regardless. We can bring in some high-priced jackass like Hasselbeck or McNabb or Palmer, or we can bring Jake back. We'll have Jimmy and Luck so he won't have to play, but having him in the locker room for cheap is definitely a win-win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on paper i like jake for that type of role - lots of experience in this system, great veteran leader, popular with teammakes - but on a practical level i just don't see it happening. we are at a crossroads in our history right now.

for as long as we can seem to remember we've had john fox as our head coach and jake delhomme as our quarterback. times have changed, and in two games fox will be gone. the veteran purge means we will have a new young team who can be molded into the type of team a new coach wants, through the draft, free agency, and gelling during camps/games.

sadly jake has no place in this. there's no room for him. the franchise has moved on, and signing jake would be a look backwards. we can't look back any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing that i am wondering guys...is..is a quarterback going to be the answer to the problems in carolina? Last year we thought that all problems would be solved through Jimmy Clausen, or alot of people did, and im not saying Jimmy Clausen is a lost cause. I think our problem can be solved by a defensive linemen or an offensive linemen. A normal qb has at least 3 seconds to get off a good pass...and when there is 3 defensive men in the back field in about 2 seconds...i dont really think that is the qbs fault....i dont believe luck is the answer to our problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know, I know all 3 aspects of our team will be addressed in the off season. I like the way Schwartz has come on, but we need to address the RT spot, and a backup C. I also think that a quality DT will be added via FA, and possibly through the draft as well. I think CB will be addressed via FA or the draft depending on staff selection. All of this is just what-if until we know what who/and what the staff will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...