Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Haynesworth wants a big payday


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Haynesworth demands top dollar

Albert Haynesworth said he loves Nashville and the Titans, but he scoffed at the notion of giving the team a hometown discount on the long-term contract he's seeking.

"Not unless they give me a 100 percent guaranteed contract,'' the veteran defensive tackle said with a smile Thursday as he visited the site of Super Bowl XLIII.

Although he declined to go into specifics, Haynesworth is seeking a six-year deal that would make him the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. Right now that designation belongs to Vikings defensive end Jared Allen, who signed a six-year contract last offseason with $32 million guaranteed and $12.2 million per year. Haynesworth made it clear he's looking to get paid.

The team already made an offer to turn a guy who had freakish athletic ability, but whose attitude and motivation were a question mark, the highest paid defensive player in the game.

Do they turn around and make that same offer to a player with a similar profile?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems very injury prone.

Not as much in previous years as early on, though he did get injured just prior to this year's playoffs.

I think his being stomp-on-the-head-of-a-guy-not-wearing-a-helmet prone is a bigger concern for some folks.

Me? I'm iffy about Haynesworth on a lot of fronts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as much in previous years as early on, though he did get injured just prior to this year's playoffs.

I think his being stomp-on-the-head-of-a-guy-not-wearing-a-helmet prone is a bigger concern for some.

Me? I'm iffy on a lot of fronts.

Oh it's a big iff, but our dline would be 100% better with him on there. Put him and Kemo in there and switch Kemo/Lewis for passing/run plays. It would give us more options on the DE sides. I don't see it happening though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to give him a substantial amount of cash, depending on the structure of the contract.

Minimal signing bonus ($6M) and reasonable base salary ($2M/year) with a majority of the money coming through roster bonuses annually. This way, if he DOES turn into a one-year wonder, he can be cut without a long-term hit.

Of course, that depends on how they compute roster bonuses into the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no way do we ever trust that clown with that kind of money. he wants it guaranteed? someone is about to get ripped off.

i sure hope it isn't us.

i don't like him and i don't trust him.

guaranteed money for him is a guaranteed ripoff for some team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no way do we ever trust that clown with that kind of money. he wants it guaranteed? someone is about to get ripped off.

i sure hope it isn't us.

i don't like him and i don't trust him.

guaranteed money for him is a guaranteed ripoff for some team.

I'm not a fan of guaranteed money to any player, just on general principle.

Guaranteed money to a guy who might be a "contract year warrior"? Huge mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a fan of guaranteed money to any player, just on general principle.

Guaranteed money to a guy who might be a "contract year warrior"? Huge mistake.

larry johnson and the chiefs is the biggest example that pops into my head.

he put that team over a barrel, raped and pillaged, and then sat on his butt and did nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...