Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortensen Trashes Richardson/Luck to Panthers on Mike and Mike


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

All I know, is if we dont get Andrew Luck, and it is our own fault. I am going to be very very upset.

Also, Gantt said last night, responding to one of my tweets.

daringantt Darin Gantt

This is somewhat comforting.

He's right anyone who trades for Luck will get raped for compensation.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, Kurb went at Mort for this

@mortreport U tlk Pnthrs = Cheap, yet he paid Fox 7.5mil 4 2-14, Pep 1mill/gme lst yr, usually all cap $. No basis for cmmnts BS #Panthers

and this is what Mort responded with:

@TheKurb Jerry Richardson is so anti-players union he's lead misinformation figure; said players want more money & benefits for less work. 6 minutes ago via TweetDeck

@TheKurb If no rookie wage scale, NFL execs think Richardson's disgust w union make him hesitate on giving #1 pick $55 mill guaranteed less than 20 seconds ago via TweetDeck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not gonna lie, the "NFL execs say" is a smear campaign to keep us from getting Luck, but I really do believe Mort about the other stuff regarding the union, misinformation, etc. That statement did sound fishy to me yesterday when JR said "less work, more benefits..." Most guys that are former players find this to be a serious concern (Ditka), but most of them aren't owners.

It's clear there has been some dishonesty on the part of JR somewhere along the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think most coaches or players give a rats a$$ about what ESPN or any other NFL sports news outlet says.

And nowhere did I state they do.

I think Harbaugh would give a rats ass about Fox's departure, the press conference yesterday, Jerry's allegiance to the owners and not his team, the lack of player pickups. Based on the past year it would be pretty easy for a coach like Harbaugh to put other teams ahead of the Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moose said on his show yesterday that the full rookie pay scale won't be in effect until 2012, and that this years pay scale won't be as large as usual but still much larger than 2012, giving Luck ample reason to declare.

This was said by Moose, after he reviewed the info with his agent. Take it FWIW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moose said on his show yesterday that the full rookie pay scale won't be in effect until 2012, and that this years pay scale won't be as large as usual but still much larger than 2012, giving Luck ample reason to declare.

This was said by Moose, after he reviewed the info with his agent. Take it FWIW

good.

I still wish JR would've saved his "catching up" presser until after the deadline for players to declare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...