Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those wishing for a Lockout


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

It doesnt mean we will have the #1 pick next year. The NFL will probably follow the NHL on what they did 5 years ago. They had a lockout and did a lottery to decide the draft order. They then did a serpentine draft. So forget about a lockout. If the Panthers want to try to get Luck next season what they need to do is trade the first round pick this year and move down. That way we have 2 shots at winning the #1 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who would want the #1 pick this year?

Doubt we could even get a 2nd for it.

There will still be a couple teams that will. Wont be the compensation like Luck would have gotten. But I can see us getting a first next year and a 3rd this year along with a first this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from everything i have seen the lottery is what will happen if there is a lockout.

trading this yea's #1, though? it ain't happening. there is just no one marketable enough for it since luck is out of the picture.

i would 100% back the decision to trade down since there is no luck, but i just don't see it being attractive for anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could easily leak it that we're going to draft Cam Newton, and maybe hype him up mroe than he's worth, and convince another team to come in and take our first for their first and second. (Here's looking at you, Bengals.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't really know at this point.

Different sources say different things. Heck, it may not even be decided on yet.

Logically speaking, why take time to decide on something like that now when the lockout hasn't happened, and might not?

I'm still of the belief that it won't happen. Sure, it may come down to the 11th Hour, but honestly, both sides know that too much money is on the line. And money talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...