Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it a guarantee that Vick is an Eagle??


unicar15

Recommended Posts

Vick isn't under contract, Kolb is. Today during the presser, Andy Reid said that he wants BOTH Vick and Kolb back on the team next year. Personally, I don't see that happening. Kolb's trade value is high and Vick is due for a new deal so something is going to give. If the Eagles decide to make a long-term commitment to Kolb, rather than a relatively short term commitment to Vick then he becomes a legitimate option for us. Ideally, if he became available we could sign him to a deal between 2 and 4 years. I hate the style of QB that he used to be but his pocket passing has really improved since the ATL days. I'd give it a shot if he was there for the taking.

I'd also take Kolb if they were willing to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will want more for Kolb than what he has proven to be worth. I think the only way Vick stays with the Eagles is if the franchise tag him. Which might no be available after the CBA. I think Vicks could come here. But I would be surprised to see him stay with the Eagles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason, I see it playing out just like Squirrel said. They didn't really want Vick starting last year until Kolb got hurt and he played so good they couldn't bench him. I think they would prefer to tag him so they can get something back for him regardless, but I think it's very possible we'd have a shot at him b/c I think they're gonna let him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's funny. When a player has one good season, people start saying "We should bring him to Carolina!" But these are the same people who say "Cut him!" as soon as he has one bad season.

As for Vick, I say why not. He's going to be on the end of his career so it would be a temporary solution that needs a long-term fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...