Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Denver may want to trade up for Fairly


jarhead

Recommended Posts

All the boards are predicting the Broncos trading up to get Fairley which would feel a large void.They are also saying Orton wants out if he will be playing behind Tebo.That would work fo me.

Our #1 pick to Denver. We get Orton, their first and 2nd round pick sounds good to me :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother is a Denver fan and he's been salivating at the chances of getting Fairley. Their DT position is lacking as well.

I wouldn't mind trading down, and then maybe seeing if we could trade down with Cinci to stock up some more picks. It all comes down to the info we have by the day of the draft though, so that can change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no way don't trade the #1 pick and lose a beast in fairely we need that postion filled he can come in and be an impact player from the start. sure we could get more picks but why would u want more picks when u can get a beast we have no good DT right now that can stop the run maybe thats becasue of the coaching or not but I say FAIRELY WILL BE NUMBER ONE PICK BY THE PANTHERS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trade down with Denver for Orton, take Green at #2. that is an excellent draft.

why trade down yet again to stockpile low round picks for mediocre talent? you timid bro?

Agree.

Every team needs role players, but they need 2-3 stars on each side of the ball. Who are our stars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...