Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Golden St. open to trading Curry


Britneck

Recommended Posts

I'd honestly let Jack and G-Dub go for him. Not together for one player of course, but I would definitely let go 2 of our core players for him.

He's already overcome that PG/SG tweener gap. Dude's a baller, and a potentially star. I would not be surprised to see either Wallace or Jack packaged with Nazr or an expiring big for Curry and Biedrins.

Jordan better make an effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two 180lb guards starting in the backcourt. Yuck.

Curry can play SG, as a matter of fact he is a better SG than he is PG. Golden State is just foolish enough to have Curry play PG and Ellis play SG.

If it were to work than Jax not Gerald has to go because Curry is to good to come off the bench and Jax cannot play the SF position.

In a perfect worlid I could see the Cats unloading a lot of unused weight and Jax for Curry.

Maybe, Jax, Najera, Diop, and Collins

for Biedrins, Curry and Wright.

However, more realisticly I see something like this

Jax

Livingston

K. Brown

Diop

for

Biedrins

Curry

Wright

and you best believe Dell will be telling Jordan to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot believe that I am reading some of this. If you are trading for Curry, you have to also trade DJ in the process.

If Curry and DJ were in the starting lineup, the Bobs would easily give up 105 pts a game.

Fans will many times ignore the defensive shortcomings of a roster tweak in the hopes of a slightly improved offensive output. That's exactly what this move would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...